From owner-freebsd-ruby@FreeBSD.ORG Wed May 26 12:09:06 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: ruby@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 728D91065679 for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 12:09:06 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from decke@FreeBSD.org) Received: from mail.itac.at (unknown [IPv6:2002:5bc2:5ac8:d:20c:29ff:fe19:7b2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id EA1478FC1D for ; Wed, 26 May 2010 12:09:05 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [91.205.172.21] (helo=webmail.bluelife.at) by mail.itac.at with esmtpa (Exim 4.63) (envelope-from ) id 1OHFPy-0001Sy-GN; Wed, 26 May 2010 14:09:02 +0200 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 14:09:03 +0200 From: Bernhard Froehlich To: "Philip M. Gollucci" In-Reply-To: <4BFCDB80.7080007@ridecharge.com> References: <4BFCDB80.7080007@ridecharge.com> Message-ID: <65de797887a2baf0bf6a016f4f0f324c@bluelife.at> X-Sender: decke@FreeBSD.org User-Agent: RoundCube Webmail/0.4-beta X-Spam-Score: -0.0 (/) X-Spam-Report: Spam detection software, running on the system "mail.itac.at", has identified this incoming email as possible spam. The original message has been attached to this so you can view it (if it isn't spam) or label similar future email. If you have any questions, see the administrator of that system for details. Content preview: On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:27:44 +0000, "Philip M. Gollucci" wrote: > redmine only works with rack 1.0.1 b/c it bundles rails < 2.3.6 in vendor/. > > See also http://www.redmine.org/boards/2/topics/10334 > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pgollucci/FreeBSD/logs/9-CURRENT-amd64-rubygems/ > > Of the 250+ rubygem- ports only a few actually depend on rack. > > devel/rubygem-gdata > devel/rubygem-rascut > japanese/rubygem-jpmobile > www/rubygem-ramaze > www/rubygem-sinatra > Anyone that can test these runtime would be appreciated > > www/redmine > www/redmine-basecamp > www/rubygem-thin > decke@ and myself are working on these > creating www/rubygem-rack101 or gem install are 2 possible solutions [...] Content analysis details: (-0.0 points, 5.0 required) pts rule name description ---- ---------------------- -------------------------------------------------- -1.4 ALL_TRUSTED Passed through trusted hosts only via SMTP 1.4 AWL AWL: From: address is in the auto white-list Cc: ruby@freebsd.org Subject: Re: www/redmine & www/rubygem-rack conflict X-BeenThere: freebsd-ruby@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: FreeBSD-specific Ruby discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 26 May 2010 12:09:06 -0000 On Wed, 26 May 2010 08:27:44 +0000, "Philip M. Gollucci" wrote: > redmine only works with rack 1.0.1 b/c it bundles rails < 2.3.6 in vendor/. > > See also http://www.redmine.org/boards/2/topics/10334 > > http://people.freebsd.org/~pgollucci/FreeBSD/logs/9-CURRENT-amd64-rubygems/ > > Of the 250+ rubygem- ports only a few actually depend on rack. > > devel/rubygem-gdata > devel/rubygem-rascut > japanese/rubygem-jpmobile > www/rubygem-ramaze > www/rubygem-sinatra > Anyone that can test these runtime would be appreciated > > www/redmine > www/redmine-basecamp > www/rubygem-thin > decke@ and myself are working on these > creating www/rubygem-rack101 or gem install are 2 possible solutions I've decided to solve it by patching the version check in redmine and tested it for a few hours now. It seems to work fine so I will commit the fix to the tree soon. The test also included thin 1.2.5 so it also seems to work fine with rack 1.1.0. http://svn.bluelife.at/index.cgi/blueports/revision/?rev=850 > mail/rubygem-actionmailer > www/rubygem-actionpack > www/rubygem-passenger > www/rubygem-rails > www/typo > we know these work > > www/rubygem-innate > already has and update and a pr for a fix -- Bernhard Froehlich http://www.bluelife.at/