From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Feb 19 21:22:30 2005 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AE10916A4CE for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:22:30 +0000 (GMT) Received: from srv1.cosmo-project.de (srv1.cosmo-project.de [213.83.6.106]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0247343D41 for ; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:22:30 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely5.cicely.de (cicely5.cicely.de [10.1.1.7]) (authenticated bits=0)j1JLMEE1004138 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=EDH-RSA-DES-CBC3-SHA bits=168 verify=OK); Sat, 19 Feb 2005 22:22:16 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (cicely12.cicely.de [IPv6:3ffe:400:8d0:301::12]) by cicely5.cicely.de (8.12.10/8.12.10) with ESMTP id j1JLLl55070121 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Sat, 19 Feb 2005 22:21:48 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: from cicely12.cicely.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id j1JLLlFv022325; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 22:21:47 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso@cicely12.cicely.de) Received: (from ticso@localhost) by cicely12.cicely.de (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id j1JLLfjU022323; Sat, 19 Feb 2005 22:21:41 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from ticso) Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 22:21:41 +0100 From: Bernd Walter To: Matthew Jacob Message-ID: <20050219212140.GT14312@cicely12.cicely.de> References: <20050216224825.39102.qmail@web26807.mail.ukl.yahoo.com> <4213D046.4080001@centtech.com> <7579f7fb05021715344d661662@mail.gmail.com> <20050218143456.GB11451@cicely12.cicely.de> <7579f7fb050218203553a1311b@mail.gmail.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <7579f7fb050218203553a1311b@mail.gmail.com> X-Operating-System: FreeBSD cicely12.cicely.de 5.2-CURRENT alpha User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.6i X-Spam-Status: No, hits=-4.9 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00 autolearn=no version=2.64 X-Spam-Report: * -4.9 BAYES_00 BODY: Bayesian spam probability is 0 to 1% * [score: 0.0000] X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 2.64 (2004-01-11) on cicely12.cicely.de cc: FreeBSD Current cc: Eric Anderson cc: ticso@cicely.de Subject: Re: newfs limits? 10TB filesystem max? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list Reply-To: ticso@cicely.de List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 19 Feb 2005 21:22:30 -0000 On Fri, Feb 18, 2005 at 08:35:34PM -0800, Matthew Jacob wrote: > I'm not sure I follow what you're asking... how much of the actual > real storage was used up in just newfs'ing 5PB? I don't remember- > something less than 20G I think... If you really want to know I'll set > it up again That's what I wanted to know. Exact values are not important - they vary much with the underlying filesystem anyway. Did you use md(4) for it, SCSI target mode disk simulation or something else? -- B.Walter BWCT http://www.bwct.de bernd@bwct.de info@bwct.de