From owner-freebsd-questions Tue Jun 26 15:30: 4 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from q.closedsrc.org (ip233.gte15.rb1.bel.nwlink.com [209.20.244.233]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2105B37B410 for ; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:29:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from lplist@closedsrc.org) Received: by q.closedsrc.org (Postfix, from userid 1003) id 48B8655407; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:15:50 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by q.closedsrc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 3704051610; Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:15:50 -0700 (PDT) Date: Tue, 26 Jun 2001 15:15:50 -0700 (PDT) From: Linh Pham To: Mike Meyer Cc: , Subject: Re: which is faster zip drive under FreeBSD: usb or parallel? In-Reply-To: <15161.2767.189737.37895@guru.mired.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG On 2001-06-26, Mike Meyer scribbled: # Why not USB for the scanner? While the Iomega SCSI may suck, my Artec # SCSI scanner creates far more problems. I solved them by putting the # scanner, the IOMega and the CDRW on their own bus, but that seems # excessive. At the time, the machine I had didn't have USB, so SCSI was the way to go. Plus I was using Windows NT 4.0 for a long time. Mind you, the USB Zip 250 that I have is for my laptop and the SCSI Zip 250 and scanner are for my desktop. -- Linh Pham [lplist@closedsrc.org] // 404b - Brain not found To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message