From owner-cvs-all Fri May 14 11:42:57 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from jade.chc-chimes.com (jade.chc-chimes.com [206.67.97.83]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9BCB714D10; Fri, 14 May 1999 11:42:41 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Received: from localhost (billf@localhost) by jade.chc-chimes.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with SMTP id OAA26893; Fri, 14 May 1999 14:44:49 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from billf@jade.chc-chimes.com) Date: Fri, 14 May 1999 14:44:49 -0400 (EDT) From: Bill Fumerola To: Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: ports INDEX In-Reply-To: <199905140607.XAA45111@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk On Thu, 13 May 1999, Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami wrote: > These are not "release engineering" tags. We don't guarantee anything > about the tags in the ports tree like we do in src (you move stuff > around, the tags still appear in the right place, etc.). So don't > give people the illusion that it means much more than just a snapshot > tag that might have been screwed up in a few months after some > repository copies. I see. It just prohibits someone from doing 'cvs co -rFOO ports/ src/' to get that kind of snapshot. That's all. > Or something like that. Peter gave the reason in a long mail a while > ago. I'll dig it up if you are interested. I'll take your word for it. :> - bill fumerola - billf@chc-chimes.com - BF1560 - computer horizons corp - - ph:(800) 252-2421 - bfumerol@computerhorizons.com - billf@FreeBSD.org - To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message