From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Nov 20 14:56:05 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 65FCDF68
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:56:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from kenobi.freebsd.org (kenobi.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::16:76])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4CBDC608
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:56:05 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from bugs.freebsd.org ([127.0.1.118])
 by kenobi.freebsd.org (8.14.9/8.14.9) with ESMTP id sAKEu5Ma086119
 for <freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org>; Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:56:05 GMT
 (envelope-from bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org)
From: bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: [Bug 195024] [maintainer-update] net-mgmt/seafile: remove
 requirements of /proc
Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:56:05 +0000
X-Bugzilla-Reason: AssignedTo
X-Bugzilla-Type: changed
X-Bugzilla-Watch-Reason: None
X-Bugzilla-Product: Ports Tree
X-Bugzilla-Component: Individual Port(s)
X-Bugzilla-Version: Latest
X-Bugzilla-Keywords: 
X-Bugzilla-Severity: Affects Many People
X-Bugzilla-Who: yan_jingfeng@yahoo.com
X-Bugzilla-Status: Needs Triage
X-Bugzilla-Priority: Normal
X-Bugzilla-Assigned-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
X-Bugzilla-Target-Milestone: ---
X-Bugzilla-Flags: 
X-Bugzilla-Changed-Fields: 
Message-ID: <bug-195024-13-LaI9HyOkKc@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
In-Reply-To: <bug-195024-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
References: <bug-195024-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Bugzilla-URL: https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/
Auto-Submitted: auto-generated
MIME-Version: 1.0
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
 <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 20 Nov 2014 14:56:05 -0000

https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=195024

--- Comment #10 from Jingfeng Yan <yan_jingfeng@yahoo.com> ---
(In reply to Jingfeng Yan from comment #9)
> (In reply to John Marino from comment #8)
> > This appears like a moot discussion.
> > 
> > The port won't build on DragonFly anyway because of this requirement:
> > LIB_DEPENDS= libfuse.so:${PORTSDIR}/sysutils/fusefs-libs
> > 
> > 
> > Using FUSE limits seafile to FreeBSD.
> 
> Do you mean DragonFly miss fuse kernel side support? I thought I checked
> roughly before, but not go to too much detail. FreeBSD and NetBSD, and
> openBSD seems to fine. the founder of DragonFlyBSD started playing eithe
> fuse-like idea in 2006.  Could you give me some idea of why fuse is missing
> there, what I can help to make this port happen on DragonFly? 
> 
> You are DPort creator, and active on DragonFly. If you can have some
> evaluation, maybe we can have a way to make it work. At the same time, I
> will check why we need fuse.

BTW, if the fuse discussion not fit here, you can send email to me
yan_jingfeng@yahoo.com.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.