Date: Wed, 22 Jun 2005 07:53:00 -0700 From: Luigi Rizzo <rizzo@icir.org> To: Andre Oppermann <andre@freebsd.org> Cc: freebsd-net@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Policy routing idea (Was: ipfw: Would it be possible tocontinue processing rest of rules after match ?) Message-ID: <20050622075300.F92493@xorpc.icir.org> In-Reply-To: <42B95F5A.DFF7F3C5@freebsd.org>; from andre@freebsd.org on Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 02:53:46PM %2B0200 References: <42B7B352.8040806@suutari.iki.fi> <20050621170649.B82876@xorpc.icir.org> <42B95F5A.DFF7F3C5@freebsd.org>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Wed, Jun 22, 2005 at 02:53:46PM +0200, Andre Oppermann wrote: ... > > i suggest to implement a new action 'setnexthop' which stores the > > next hop as an MTAG with the packet (so it is preserved if the > > packet gets passed to dummynet). > > Please don't store routing table pointers. All the locking due that would be just an IP address, not the table pointer. cheers luigi
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20050622075300.F92493>