From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Mar 16 10:25:18 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 63EF4A0C; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 10:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru [IPv6:2a01:4f8:131:60a2::2]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 21317163; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 10:25:18 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lion.home.serebryakov.spb.ru (unknown [IPv6:2001:470:923f:1:6953:60be:b581:151f]) (Authenticated sender: lev@serebryakov.spb.ru) by onlyone.friendlyhosting.spb.ru (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 369D54AC1C; Sun, 16 Mar 2014 14:25:14 +0400 (MSK) Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 14:25:06 +0400 From: Lev Serebryakov Organization: FreeBSD Project X-Priority: 3 (Normal) Message-ID: <958443052.20140316142506@serebryakov.spb.ru> To: Julian Elischer Subject: Re: GSoC proposition: pico FreeBSD for soho MIPS routers (OpenWRT alike) In-Reply-To: <5324B169.3000805@freebsd.org> References: <53243AD5.1000603@unsane.co.uk> <138446120.20140315154414@serebryakov.spb.ru> <5324B169.3000805@freebsd.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, CeDeROM , Vincent Hoffman X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.17 Precedence: list Reply-To: lev@FreeBSD.org List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 16 Mar 2014 10:25:18 -0000 Hello, Julian. You wrote 16 =D0=BC=D0=B0=D1=80=D1=82=D0=B0 2014 =D0=B3., 0:00:41: >> VH> I think this is mostly done? I'd suggest that you look at >> VH> https://github.com/kientzle/crochet-freebsd >> Problem not in a script (we have nanobsd for it!), but minimal size of >> usable system, both compressed (think: 16Mb or even 4Mb of Flash) and >> uncompressed (think: 32Mb of RAM). JE> hense picoBSD JE> nanoBSD is small but picoBSD is smaller It is not enough. Kernel with all needed drivers (think: netgrpah for PPPoE/L2TP/PPTP and other net/mpd5-supported protocols? USB for external drive, etc) and needed software (as system one -- WiFi stack, dhclient & Ko, and ported one too -- dhcpd + mpd5 at least, and, may be, samba for systems with USB port) is much bigger than typical SOHO routers flash size. And I don't mention that we need some HTTPD and web interface too. --=20 // Black Lion AKA Lev Serebryakov