From owner-freebsd-doc  Mon Jun  3  2:20:10 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.FreeBSD.org [216.136.204.21])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id F3F5C37B401
	for <freebsd-doc@hub.freebsd.org>; Mon,  3 Jun 2002 02:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id g539K3Q04302;
	Mon, 3 Jun 2002 02:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from gnats)
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 02:20:03 -0700 (PDT)
Message-Id: <200206030920.g539K3Q04302@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.org
Cc: 
From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
Subject: Re: docs/38771: Documentation error in FAQ.
Reply-To: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
Sender: owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-doc.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-doc>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-doc>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

The following reply was made to PR docs/38771; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Peter Pentchev <roam@ringlet.net>
To: Giorgos Keramidas <keramida@FreeBSD.org>
Cc: bug-followup@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: docs/38771: Documentation error in FAQ.
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 2002 12:10:26 +0300

 On Fri, May 31, 2002 at 07:30:03PM -0700, Giorgos Keramidas wrote:
 >  
 >  How about this?
 >  
 >  %%%
 >  Index: book.sgml
 >  ===================================================================
 >  RCS file: /home/ncvs/doc/en_US.ISO8859-1/books/faq/book.sgml,v
 >  BBBBBretrieving revision 1.445
 >  diff -u -r1.445 book.sgml
 >  --- book.sgml	30 May 2002 21:11:55 -0000	1.445
 >  +++ book.sgml	1 Jun 2002 02:20:54 -0000
 >  @@ -432,7 +432,7 @@
 >           </question>
 >   
 >           <answer>
 >  -          <para>As a general principle, the FreeBSD core team only release
 >  +          <para>As a general principle, the FreeBSD release-engineering team only release
 >               a new version of FreeBSD when they believe that there are
 >               sufficient new features and/or bug fixes to justify one, and
 >               are satisfied that these new developments have been tested
 >  %%%
 
 And while we are here, why not just use &a.re; instead? :)
 
 G'luck,
 Peter
 
 -- 
 Peter Pentchev	roam@ringlet.net	roam@FreeBSD.org
 PGP key:	http://people.FreeBSD.org/~roam/roam.key.asc
 Key fingerprint	FDBA FD79 C26F 3C51 C95E  DF9E ED18 B68D 1619 4553
 This sentence claims to be an Epimenides paradox, but it is lying.

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-doc" in the body of the message