From owner-freebsd-arch@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jul 27 03:36:02 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5B64016A4CE; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 03:36:02 +0000 (GMT) Received: from bilbo.otenet.gr (bilbo.otenet.gr [195.170.0.13]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 9173C43D2D; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 03:36:01 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: from gothmog.gr (patr530-a007.otenet.gr [212.205.215.7]) i6R3ZuEq001296; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:35:57 +0300 Received: from gothmog.gr (gothmog [127.0.0.1]) by gothmog.gr (8.12.11/8.12.11) with ESMTP id i6R3ZilT025117; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:35:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Received: (from giorgos@localhost) by gothmog.gr (8.12.11/8.12.11/Submit) id i6R3ZiJ9025116; Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:35:44 +0300 (EEST) (envelope-from keramida@ceid.upatras.gr) Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 06:35:44 +0300 From: Giorgos Keramidas To: Sergey Babkin Message-ID: <20040727033544.GA25010@gothmog.gr> References: <20040718184008.GC57678@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20040719075952.GG57678@darkness.comp.waw.pl> <20040719.081356.51946167.imp@bsdimp.com> <200407191855.19885.max@love2party.net> <4105987E.5FC50517@bellatlantic.net> <20040727032253.GA24778@gothmog.gr> <20040727032917.GA24942@gothmog.gr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040727032917.GA24942@gothmog.gr> cc: Max Laier cc: pjd@freebsd.org cc: zeratul2@wanadoo.es cc: nsouch@free.fr cc: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org Subject: Re: some PRs X-BeenThere: freebsd-arch@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussion related to FreeBSD architecture List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 27 Jul 2004 03:36:02 -0000 On 2004-07-27 06:29, Giorgos Keramidas wrote: > : $ ./lala > : hello world > : $ ./lala >/dev/full > : $ echo $? > : 0 > : $ > > The fact that /dev/full was used as the output device didn't reveal the > potential write() problem. Or at least cannot be distinguished by a program that doesn't produce output (for which a zero termination code would be normal). Giorgos