Date: Fri, 27 Nov 1998 16:58:10 -0500 (EST) From: Alfred Perlstein <bright@hotjobs.com> To: cnielsen@pobox.com Cc: freebsd-sparc@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: [Ultra] Compiler, again Message-ID: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811271655490.1605-100000@bright.fx.genx.net> In-Reply-To: <Pine.BSF.4.05.9811271322230.96971-100000@ender.sf.scient.com>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, 27 Nov 1998, Christopher Nielsen wrote: > > If i merge this directory into the extracted directory then > > configure/compile it seems to work as then the binutils compiled fine, > > however i think i messed up the flags i ghave to configure because while > > this "method" of building worked for binutils, it seems that the same > > flags passed to configure for gcc produce an empty makefile. :( > > IIRC, getting the whole thing to build was a non-trivial process that > involved applying several patches by hand. Most of the patches supplied > with the rpms have already been applied to the latest 2.7.x release. I'll > revisit the build process this weekend and produce documentation to get > the compiler and the rest of the toolchain built. Thanks, that would be super cool. "Dammit i'm a asm hacker not a compiler guru Jim!" -Alfred I'm also wondering about doing a build under sparc (via solaris 7) but i don't think this is viable, do you think that using UltraP for a compiler platform is a bad idea? > > -- > Christopher Nielsen > Scient: The eBusiness Systems Innovator > <http://www.scient.com>; > cnielsen@scient.com > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-sparc" in the body of the message
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?Pine.BSF.4.05.9811271655490.1605-100000>