From owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Apr 14 06:00:17 2015
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-xen@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id E6563EE3
 for <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:00:17 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from violet.upc.es (violet.upc.es [147.83.2.51])
 (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (Client CN "relay.upc.es", Issuer "TERENA SSL CA" (verified OK))
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 4DEF18F5
 for <freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>; Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:00:16 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from ackerman2.upc.es (ackerman2.upc.es [147.83.2.244])
 by violet.upc.es (8.14.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id t3E6022H016581
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=FAIL);
 Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:00:03 +0200
Received: from [10.0.2.151] ([147.83.40.10]) (authenticated bits=0)
 by ackerman2.upc.es (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id t3E601qd029334
 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES128-SHA bits=128 verify=NO);
 Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:00:01 +0200
Message-ID: <552CACE1.8070101@entel.upc.edu>
Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:00:01 +0200
From: =?UTF-8?B?R3VzdGF1IFDDqXJleg==?= <gperez@entel.upc.edu>
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64;
 rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.6.0
MIME-Version: 1.0
To: =?UTF-8?B?Um9nZXIgUGF1IE1vbm7DqQ==?= <roger.pau@citrix.com>
CC: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Two issues with xen
References: <5528F578.2030908@entel.upc.edu> <552BAE1C.1090603@citrix.com>
 <97e3bb8b2ea7acfb89c861e21f1534c7@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
 <552BE23D.9030107@citrix.com>
 <b16e212cff0cac09e7da7b48a7d67998@webmail.entel.upc.edu>
 <552BFBD3.7060304@citrix.com>
In-Reply-To: <552BFBD3.7060304@citrix.com>
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
X-Greylist: Delayed for 67:39:20 by milter-greylist-4.4.3 (violet.upc.es
 [147.83.2.51]); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:00:03 +0200 (CEST)
X-Greylist: Default is to whitelist mail, not delayed by milter-greylist-4.4.3
 (ackerman2.upc.es [147.83.2.244]); Tue, 14 Apr 2015 08:00:01 +0200 (CEST)
X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.70 on 147.83.2.244
X-Mail-Scanned: Criba 2.0 + Clamd
X-BeenThere: freebsd-xen@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.20
Precedence: list
List-Id: Discussion of the freebsd port to xen - implementation and usage
 <freebsd-xen.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-xen>,
 <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-xen/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-xen@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-xen>,
 <mailto:freebsd-xen-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 14 Apr 2015 06:00:18 -0000


>>> Probably, but without a serial console it's impossible to tell. Can you
>>> apply the following patch to FreeBSD and rebuild the kernel?
>>>
>>> https://people.freebsd.org/~royger/mem.patch
>>>
>>    What would I see after applying this patch? is it designed to solve
>> the reboot?

    Hello,

    this morning I was able to the patch, and apparently it fixes the
reboots with PV domU guests. Right now I'm installing debian as PV with
no problems.  Thank you. 
 
    As I'm using 4.5 from the ports tree on this laptop, I'd like to ask
the port's maintainer (bapt) to integrate this patch. Do you think it
would be safe to integrate the patch in the ports tree?

    Best,

   Gustau