From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Oct 3 23:21:26 2007 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E9AD616A419 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2007 23:21:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lisa@jellico.com) Received: from mail.jellico.com (mail.jellico.com [207.191.185.6]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 84F3513C45A for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2007 23:21:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from lisa@jellico.com) Received: from CaseyHome (node150.224.100.208.1dial.com [208.100.224.150] (may be forged)) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.jellico.com (8.13.1/8.13.1) with ESMTP id l93NTi8V043771 for ; Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:29:47 -0400 (EDT) (envelope-from lisa@jellico.com) Message-ID: <5141C17677DA4B9ABA3F71D0979D1974@CaseyHome> From: "jellico.com, Inc." To: References: <011e01c805fc$4c5dc3d0$d5b9bfcf@lisac> <200710032304.59151.fbsd.questions@rachie.is-a-geek.net> <20071003213035.GA60715@owl.midgard.homeip.net> In-Reply-To: <20071003213035.GA60715@owl.midgard.homeip.net> Date: Wed, 3 Oct 2007 19:21:22 -0400 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; reply-type=original Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-Priority: 3 X-MSMail-Priority: Normal X-Mailer: Microsoft Windows Mail 6.0.6000.16480 X-MimeOLE: Produced By Microsoft MimeOLE V6.0.6000.16480 X-Scanned-By: MIMEDefang 2.61 on 207.191.185.6 Subject: Re: FreeBsd e-mail question X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 03 Oct 2007 23:21:27 -0000 Hi, >> 2) Better option is to change the default temp-name in qpopper.config: >> set temp-name "%s.pop" >> so that rmuser will detect it automatically. > > A third option is to write a wrapper shell script that first calls rmuser > and then removes the remaining mail drop file, and use this script to > remove > users instead of calling rmuser directly. > > Option 2) above sounds like a better solution though. I agree, that sounds like the best solution. Just to be on the safe side, I think I'll make a backup of rmuser first ;-) Thanks for all the suggestions. Lisa Casey