Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:16:51 +0100
From:      Matteo Riondato <matteo@freebsd.org>
To:        Daichi GOTO <daichi@freebsd.org>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, ozawa@ongs.co.jp
Subject:   Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010
Message-ID:  <20060110081651.GD42716@kaiser.sig11.org>
In-Reply-To: <43C2472C.5070103@freebsd.org>
References:  <E1EuQjU-000JgQ-DK@cs1.cs.huji.ac.il> <43BD1054.7020409@ongs.co.jp> <43C2472C.5070103@freebsd.org>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 08:21:16PM +0900, Daichi GOTO wrote:
> I have updated the patches:
> 
> For 7-current patch:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p3.diff
> 
> For 6.x patch:
> http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p3.diff
> 
> changes from -p2 to -p3:
> - fixed problem of attribute associated with shadow dir
> - fixed lock/unlock problem (-p2 is not enought of this)
> - fixed initial treatment problem of some componentnames
> 
> Please do the unionfs test with above new patch.

I think that on sys/fs/unionfs/union_vfsops.c, line 116, done should
be size_t, to have unionfs compiled on amd64 (and probably other
!32bit archs)

Best Regards
-- 
Matteo Riondato
FreeBSD Volunteer (http://freebsd.org)
G.U.F.I. Staff Member (http://www.gufi.org)
FreeSBIE Developer (http://www.freesbie.org)



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060110081651.GD42716>