From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Jan 10 08:16:53 2006 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 28AFB16A41F; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:16:53 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matteo@freebsd.org) Received: from vsmtp4.tin.it (vsmtp4.tin.it [212.216.176.224]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A85FA43D45; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:16:52 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from matteo@freebsd.org) Received: from kaiser.sig11.org (82.54.178.124) by vsmtp4.tin.it (7.2.060.1) id 43BC4306003F0CFE; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:16:58 +0100 Received: by kaiser.sig11.org (Postfix, from userid 1000) id 7000C6306; Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:16:51 +0100 (CET) Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 09:16:51 +0100 From: Matteo Riondato To: Daichi GOTO Message-ID: <20060110081651.GD42716@kaiser.sig11.org> Mail-Followup-To: Matteo Riondato , Daichi GOTO , freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, ozawa@ongs.co.jp References: <43BD1054.7020409@ongs.co.jp> <43C2472C.5070103@freebsd.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <43C2472C.5070103@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.2.1i Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org, freebsd-current@freebsd.org, ozawa@ongs.co.jp Subject: Re: [unionfs][patch] improvements of the unionfs - Problem Report, kern/91010 X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 10 Jan 2006 08:16:53 -0000 On Mon, Jan 09, 2006 at 08:21:16PM +0900, Daichi GOTO wrote: > I have updated the patches: > > For 7-current patch: > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs-p3.diff > > For 6.x patch: > http://people.freebsd.org/~daichi/unionfs/unionfs6-p3.diff > > changes from -p2 to -p3: > - fixed problem of attribute associated with shadow dir > - fixed lock/unlock problem (-p2 is not enought of this) > - fixed initial treatment problem of some componentnames > > Please do the unionfs test with above new patch. I think that on sys/fs/unionfs/union_vfsops.c, line 116, done should be size_t, to have unionfs compiled on amd64 (and probably other !32bit archs) Best Regards -- Matteo Riondato FreeBSD Volunteer (http://freebsd.org) G.U.F.I. Staff Member (http://www.gufi.org) FreeSBIE Developer (http://www.freesbie.org)