From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Feb 6 19:56:24 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D8D9616A419 for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:56:24 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl [IPv6:2001:4070:101:2::1]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 285D813C4DB for ; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 19:54:44 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (localhost [IPv6:::1]) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8) with ESMTP id m16JrXDK005044; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:53:33 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Received: from localhost (wojtek@localhost) by wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl (8.13.8/8.13.8/Submit) with ESMTP id m16JrSY5005041; Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:53:31 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from wojtek@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl) Date: Wed, 6 Feb 2008 20:53:28 +0100 (CET) From: Wojciech Puchar To: "millueradfa@yahoo.com" In-Reply-To: <50460.33951.qm@web34512.mail.mud.yahoo.com> Message-ID: <20080206205042.H4868@wojtek.tensor.gdynia.pl> References: <50460.33951.qm@web34512.mail.mud.yahoo.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Some ideas for FreeBSD X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 06 Feb 2008 19:56:25 -0000 > > My first is to allow for dynamically resizeable swap > file of some sort, and via kqueue, a notification especially with todays drives - it's waste of time to implement this. nobody use swap FILES at all if swapping is needed unless he/she have no choice. swapping partition always will be faster. > believe this happened to when the swap partition and a > swap file were on the same drive. Perhaps a way should > be looked at to have multiple swap partititions and why you simply won't make swap partition BIGGER on the first place. swapping to files will be always much slower.