From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Thu Jul 22 06:48:58 2004 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 73BC516A4CE for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 06:48:58 +0000 (GMT) Received: from arginine.spc.org (arginine.spc.org [195.206.69.236]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E27CB43D48 for ; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 06:48:57 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from bms@spc.org) Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 327E165410; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 07:48:56 +0100 (BST) Received: from arginine.spc.org ([127.0.0.1]) by localhost (arginine.spc.org [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024) with LMTP id 49305-01; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 07:48:55 +0100 (BST) Received: from empiric.dek.spc.org (82-147-17-88.dsl.uk.rapidplay.com [82.147.17.88]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by arginine.spc.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 590DE6530A; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 07:48:55 +0100 (BST) Received: by empiric.dek.spc.org (Postfix, from userid 1001) id A4EE46180; Thu, 22 Jul 2004 07:48:54 +0100 (BST) Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 07:48:54 +0100 From: Bruce M Simpson To: Daniel Eischen Message-ID: <20040722064854.GG775@empiric.dek.spc.org> Mail-Followup-To: Daniel Eischen , Martin , Kim Culhan , FreeBSD Current References: <1090449108.72182.31.camel@klotz.local> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: cc: Kim Culhan cc: FreeBSD Current cc: Martin Subject: Re: laptop for -current X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 22 Jul 2004 06:48:58 -0000 On Wed, Jul 21, 2004 at 10:19:58PM -0400, Daniel Eischen wrote: > > My Thinkpad R40 works quite well, too. > > Not mine. My R40 doesn't work well due to bugs with ATA retry > handling. I wouldn't recommend any IBM until this is fixed. This is *definitely a show stopper for 5.3*. Just my 2 pence. BMS