From owner-freebsd-current Mon Dec 3 13: 2:51 2001 Delivered-To: freebsd-current@freebsd.org Received: from elischer.org (adsl-64-164-8-96.dsl.snfc21.pacbell.net [64.164.8.96]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0080437B405 for ; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 13:02:43 -0800 (PST) Received: (from julian@localhost) by elischer.org (8.11.6/8.11.6) id fB3L0s101766; Mon, 3 Dec 2001 13:00:54 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from julian) Date: Mon, 3 Dec 2001 13:00:54 -0800 (PST) From: Julian Elischer Message-Id: <200112032100.fB3L0s101766@elischer.org> To: bp@butya.kz, sheldonh@starjuice.net Subject: Re: smbfs support Cc: fjoe@iclub.nsu.ru, freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG, przemyslaw.kowalczyk@engine.com.pl In-Reply-To: Sender: owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > > On Wed, 28 Nov 2001, Sheldon Hearn wrote: > > > | I have some untested patches in my tree and I will contact bp this > > | week about them (I wanted to import smbfs userland to the tree and > > | already got ok from bp but could not test it because kernel-side smbfs > > | is not compilable yet). > > > > Excellent news! > > Indeed. > > > Presumably, if bp doesn't respond by the end of the year, you'll go > > ahead regardless? :-) > > Actually, bp responded much faster than you expected :) > Patches submitted by Max were mostly correct except for two or three > lines and now committed to the tree. Again, special thanks to him for very > good work. > > However, I'm still don't have enough spare time and really hope > Max will import userland part of smbfs soon. > do these patches include the proc->thread changes needed? > -- > Boris Popov > http://rbp.euro.ru > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-current" in the body of the message