From owner-freebsd-hackers@FreeBSD.ORG Tue Oct 30 11:59:55 2012 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [69.147.83.52]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B82AA3D7 for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:59:55 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk) Received: from mail.tdx.com (mail.tdx.com [62.13.128.18]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 45FB58FC1E for ; Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:59:55 +0000 (UTC) Received: from MightyAtom.tdx.co.uk (storm.tdx.co.uk [62.13.130.251]) (authenticated bits=0) by mail.tdx.com (8.14.3/8.14.3/) with ESMTP id q9UBxrVU033697 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-DSS-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO); Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:59:54 GMT Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:59:46 +0000 From: Karl Pielorz To: Erich Dollansky Subject: Re: Threaded 6.4 code compiled under 9.0 uses a lot more memory?.. Message-ID: In-Reply-To: <20121030182727.48f5e649@X220.ovitrap.com> References: <20121030182727.48f5e649@X220.ovitrap.com> X-Mailer: Mulberry/4.0.8 (Win32) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Cc: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Technical Discussions relating to FreeBSD List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:59:55 -0000 --On 30 October 2012 18:27 +0700 Erich Dollansky wrote: > is it still the same compiler? Depends how you mean 'the same' - on the 6.4 system it shows: cc (GCC) 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305 And, on the 9.0-S it shows: cc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD] So 'same' - but different versions. > I assume that it is a plain FreeBSD program without X. Yes. They are 'plain' programs - no X or anything. Now they've been running for an hour or so - they've gotten a little larger 552M/154M and 703M/75M. If it's not harmful I can live with it - it was just a bit of a surprise. -Karl