Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Tue, 30 Oct 2012 11:59:46 +0000
From:      Karl Pielorz <kpielorz_lst@tdx.co.uk>
To:        Erich Dollansky <erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com>
Cc:        freebsd-hackers@freebsd.org
Subject:   Re: Threaded 6.4 code compiled under 9.0 uses a lot more memory?..
Message-ID:  <E46B717DCFC9273E8BEC5100@MightyAtom.tdx.co.uk>
In-Reply-To: <20121030182727.48f5e649@X220.ovitrap.com>
References:  <A92CE63E6E6DB93B366F4A42@MightyAtom.tdx.co.uk> <20121030182727.48f5e649@X220.ovitrap.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help


--On 30 October 2012 18:27 +0700 Erich Dollansky 
<erichfreebsdlist@ovitrap.com> wrote:

> is it still the same compiler?

Depends how you mean 'the same' - on the 6.4 system it shows:

   cc (GCC) 3.4.6 [FreeBSD] 20060305

And, on the 9.0-S it shows:

   cc (GCC) 4.2.1 20070831 patched [FreeBSD]

So 'same' - but different versions.

> I assume that it is a plain FreeBSD program without X.

Yes. They are 'plain' programs - no X or anything.

Now they've been running for an hour or so - they've gotten a little larger 
552M/154M and 703M/75M.

If it's not harmful I can live with it - it was just a bit of a surprise.

-Karl



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?E46B717DCFC9273E8BEC5100>