From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Feb 22 21:26:26 2013 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.FreeBSD.org [8.8.178.115]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1F017E38 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 21:26:26 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from moonlightakkiy@yahoo.ca) Received: from nm12-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com (nm12-vm0.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com [98.139.213.140]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with SMTP id 9A510CC0 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 21:26:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from [98.139.215.140] by nm12.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Feb 2013 21:26:19 -0000 Received: from [98.139.211.193] by tm11.bullet.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Feb 2013 21:26:19 -0000 Received: from [127.0.0.1] by smtp202.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with NNFMP; 22 Feb 2013 21:26:19 -0000 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=yahoo.ca; s=s1024; t=1361568379; bh=DLDOxVaJrh9qa6Io3NyYXFRbVw6Bq1cNuwn2+CQ18AY=; h=X-Yahoo-Newman-Id:X-Yahoo-Newman-Property:X-YMail-OSG:X-Yahoo-SMTP:Received:Received:MIME-Version:X-Received:Received:In-Reply-To:References:Date:Message-ID:Subject:From:To:Cc:Content-Type; b=XE81DPxBkn7MpPWOelPZQgomW75K7E0rhRUfKLEBFxIu8mFmwxeAQYNLjgXaY/j/zZyfRlARiSL9W2hoenK8IVEjHYRFXIJz71hdDBjeItiW7ZQ4YGEoJDWKDpD7u20tdxcLC32fktrkuQrqCCaw3NJQJauEPJq5VjJ6L6Sn/KY= X-Yahoo-Newman-Id: 342534.48816.bm@smtp202.mail.bf1.yahoo.com X-Yahoo-Newman-Property: ymail-3 X-YMail-OSG: BlNVMHoVM1mBy22aoQpD6iP0h2z31yUoAGAAo6BrpRMj3PR QM7aI6vm_7YP8_bbU185x4zjFygjQr2mnNe71uTR0krfflm4DRblpHZd_wQf 69wilrC1eioR9_tiUgEO2wkPJG9smkYz3yMhBcw5o.YE.ErqqgsRrbkYACZ6 ZFRFLkf.q8iRc1h_96ajPs3tKZ31YAev7Ueatz_GtUtFo4oRKoNV.BZP9_wa mrWtuTL2m_Z1ms.p6EYiuw95xSHv3Cy.5sATPSNkRcz5_aBc2lD4TQ7cYq0x DBxBQym0KyRvXz_fhYaCT63T.cRcjReNbNSM2FIdFVGG4mZU2OLCOCREi60d lCINW789R8sZAXJve7EURlK_YjktVMim5G_K0Jg4sC5Lhp3CcbKD7tMpJf76 W5Grf6E2rRW5vJQ9VcJkXwRevm35hEfIyKuYvQeGPU3bqDKfT84o_5FkGJYd mCwXPcrDLM7SczxzXyA-- X-Yahoo-SMTP: Xr6qjFWswBAEmd20sAvB4Q3keqXvXsIH9TjJ Received: from mail-pb0-f43.google.com (moonlightakkiy@209.85.160.43 with plain) by smtp202.mail.bf1.yahoo.com with SMTP; 22 Feb 2013 13:26:19 -0800 PST Received: by mail-pb0-f43.google.com with SMTP id md12so618724pbc.2 for ; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:26:18 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Received: by 10.68.130.1 with SMTP id oa1mr5358568pbb.134.1361568378326; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:26:18 -0800 (PST) Received: by 10.68.52.170 with HTTP; Fri, 22 Feb 2013 13:26:17 -0800 (PST) In-Reply-To: <201302222005.36490.bschmidt@techwires.net> References: <201302180246.r1I2kocv064092@freefall.freebsd.org> <201302222005.36490.bschmidt@techwires.net> Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 14:26:17 -0700 Message-ID: Subject: Re: kern/176201: [net80211] [patch] 11n station includes unrelated ht params into ASSOC_REQ packet From: PseudoCylon To: Bernhard Schmidt Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 Cc: Adrian Chadd , freebsd-wireless@freebsd.org, freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.14 Precedence: list List-Id: Bug reports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 22 Feb 2013 21:26:26 -0000 On Fri, Feb 22, 2013 at 12:05 PM, Bernhard Schmidt wrote: > On Friday, February 22, 2013 07:52:47 PM Adrian Chadd wrote: >> Hm, it's possible in my sleep deprived state that I'm on the right but >> wrong track here. >> >> The OP problem is that we're not advertising the right capabilities >> when we associate, right? > > Correct. I didn't patch it right, but all of us agree on sta isn't sending correct param at association. With current code, sta sends back whatever it has received in probe resp packet. > >> Why aren't we just advertising the VAP ampdumax and ampdudensity no >> matter what the operating mode? Why are we capping those parameters to >> the learnt-from-AP parameters? > > Because the AP would otherwise deny the association request. Should ap only allow node which caps match ap's to associate? (By the way, can anyone point me to the code does denial? I couldn't find it.) AK