From owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Sep 11 08:14:38 2003
Return-Path: <owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 37F6716A4BF; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:14:38 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (trang.nuxi.com [66.93.134.19])
	by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 516EC44015; Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:14:37 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com)
Received: from dragon.nuxi.com (obrien@localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h8BFEQnW085750;
	Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:14:26 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien@dragon.nuxi.com)
Received: (from obrien@localhost)
	by dragon.nuxi.com (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h8BFEPVa085749;
	Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:14:25 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from obrien)
Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 08:14:25 -0700
From: "David O'Brien" <obrien@FreeBSD.org>
To: Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav <des@des.no>
Message-ID: <20030911151425.GA85714@dragon.nuxi.com>
References: <200309110014.h8B0EHOX044603@repoman.freebsd.org>
	<xzpisnz68d0.fsf@dwp.des.no>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <xzpisnz68d0.fsf@dwp.des.no>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i
X-Operating-System: FreeBSD 5.1-CURRENT
Organization: The NUXI BSD Group
X-Pgp-Rsa-Fingerprint: B7 4D 3E E9 11 39 5F A3  90 76 5D 69 58 D9 98 7A
X-Pgp-Rsa-Keyid: 1024/34F9F9D5
cc: cvs-src@FreeBSD.org
cc: src-committers@FreeBSD.org
cc: cvs-all@FreeBSD.org
cc: Jake Burkholder <jake@FreeBSD.org>
Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/etc/etc.sparc64 ttys
X-BeenThere: cvs-all@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1
Precedence: list
Reply-To: obrien@FreeBSD.org
List-Id: CVS commit messages for the entire tree <cvs-all.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/cvs-all>
List-Post: <mailto:cvs-all@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/cvs-all>,
	<mailto:cvs-all-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 11 Sep 2003 15:14:38 -0000

On Thu, Sep 11, 2003 at 10:24:11AM +0200, Dag-Erling Sm?rgrav wrote:
> Jake Burkholder <jake@FreeBSD.org> writes:
> >   Log:
> >   Changed the ttyd entries to ttyu, which correspond to the device nodes
> >   created by uart(4).
> 
> Is there a good reason for uart to use ttyu instead of ttyd?  There's
> no risk of conflict even if both uart and sio are present, thanks to
> devfs, so why not use the traditional name?

I hate to say it -- as an owner of sparc64 and amd64, alpha, & i386
FreeBSD machines using serial consoles and thus affected by this, I agree
with des.