From owner-freebsd-questions Fri Nov 14 05:28:39 1997 Return-Path: Received: (from root@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) id FAA27802 for questions-outgoing; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 05:28:39 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-questions) Received: from adam.adonai.net (adam.adonai.net [207.8.83.2]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.7/8.8.7) with ESMTP id FAA27699 for ; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 05:27:22 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from leec@adam.adonai.net) Received: from localhost (leec@localhost) by adam.adonai.net (8.8.5/8.7.3) with SMTP id HAA16859; Fri, 14 Nov 1997 07:22:56 -0600 (CST) Date: Fri, 14 Nov 1997 07:22:56 -0600 (CST) From: "Lee Crites (AEI)" To: David Greenman cc: questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: Walnut Creek In-Reply-To: <199711140629.WAA29131@implode.root.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk On Thu, 13 Nov 1997, David Greenman wrote: =>>Just out of idle curiosity, are there other "local changes" =>>besides the memory one? =>> =>>My main reason for asking is because I use www.cdrom.com as an =>>example of how kick-butt FreeBSD is. If that site is better =>>because of a bunch of "local changes," then I need another =>>example... => => I thought I said "Don't ask...". :-) I took your "don't ask" as meaning "don't ask for the *changed code*" not "don't ask *about* the changes." If I misinterpreted, sorry. =>want to fix the problem correctly by changing the way that some of the TCP =>timer mechanisms work (esp wrt delayed acks). This and other TCP scalabilty =>improvements are on my short term TODO list and I hope to have them completed =>prior to the 3.0 release. Killer goal. Too many people go for the quick fix. Lee