From owner-freebsd-apache@FreeBSD.ORG Sat Jun 13 23:14:42 2009 Return-Path: Delivered-To: apache@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id AB7DA106564A; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:14:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from EXHUB015-4.exch015.msoutlookonline.net (exhub015-4.exch015.msoutlookonline.net [207.5.72.96]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 903888FC14; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:14:42 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from pgollucci@p6m7g8.com) Received: from [192.168.1.3] (72.83.160.7) by smtpx15.msoutlookonline.net (207.5.72.103) with Microsoft SMTP Server (TLS) id 8.1.358.0; Sat, 13 Jun 2009 16:14:42 -0700 Message-ID: <4A3432E1.20602@p6m7g8.com> Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 19:14:41 -0400 From: "Philip M. Gollucci" Organization: P6 Web Applications User-Agent: Thunderbird 2.0.0.21 (Windows/20090302) MIME-Version: 1.0 To: "Mikhail T." References: <1244916221.1261.10.camel@hood.oook.cz> <4A33FB7F.7040401@aldan.algebra.com> <1244922033.1261.19.camel@hood.oook.cz> <4A3401AA.40409@aldan.algebra.com> <1244922341.1261.20.camel@hood.oook.cz> <4A3404B0.6080205@aldan.algebra.com> <1244923357.1261.22.camel@hood.oook.cz> <4A340682.4030705@aldan.algebra.com> In-Reply-To: <4A340682.4030705@aldan.algebra.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset="UTF-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Cc: pav@freebsd.org, Erwin Lansing , apache@freebsd.org Subject: Re: [Fwd: mod_dtcl-0.12.0_1 failed on amd64 8] X-BeenThere: freebsd-apache@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Support of apache-related ports List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sat, 13 Jun 2009 23:14:42 -0000 Mikhail T. wrote: > Pav Lucistnik написав(ла): >> Mikhail T. píše v so 13. 06. 2009 v 15:57 -0400: >> >>> Pav Lucistnik написав(ла): >>> >>>> After closer look, it seems >>>> - this failure is present on both 6.x and 8.x runs >>>> - this failure was reported to you two months ago >>>> >>>> >>> On May 27th (not two months ago) Erwin sent me a report about failure on >>> i386: >>> >>> mod_dtcl.c -o mod_dtcl.So >>> mod_dtcl.c: In function `get_parse_exec_file': >>> mod_dtcl.c:383: warning: long unsigned int format, time_t arg (arg 4) >>> mod_dtcl.c:383: warning: long unsigned int format, time_t arg (arg 5) >>> >>> >>> That's a completely different error. I'm not aware of any other >>> outstanding problems with the port. >>> >> That was from old 6.x log, meanwhile >> >> mod_dtcl.c: In function 'get_parse_exec_file': >> mod_dtcl.c:383: warning: format '%lx' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'time_t' >> mod_dtcl.c:383: warning: format '%lx' expects type 'long unsigned int', but argument 5 has type 'time_t' >> *** Error code 1 >> >> is an old log from 8.x which is the same thing, basically. >> > Agreed, I'll fix this i386-specific problem -- which is only two /weeks/ > old -- and unbreak the port. >> The log I had forwarded is not related to this and is a new, second >> problem, that only recently appeared. >> > Whatever is wrong with linking will have to await response from > apache@... Yours, I've been getting the linking error since ~March and Channing's USE_APACHE=yes to USE_APACHE=13 is a no-op. Thats on 8-CURRENT-amd64. http://tb.p6m7g8.net/index.php?action=failed_buildports&build=8-CURRENT-amd64-apache more specificially -- http://tb.p6m7g8.net/errors/8-CURRENT-amd64-apache/mod_dtcl-0.12.0_1.log Unsurprisingly, we didn't get from QAT b/c its on 7-STABLE.