From owner-freebsd-questions Mon Aug 21 16:14:22 1995 Return-Path: questions-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) id QAA17449 for questions-outgoing; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 16:14:22 -0700 Received: from emerald.oz.net (emerald.oz.net [198.68.184.2]) by freefall.FreeBSD.org (8.6.11/8.6.6) with ESMTP id QAA17441 for ; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 16:14:20 -0700 Received: from wsantee.oz.net by emerald.oz.net via ESMTP (8.6.12/930416.SGI) for id XAA09381; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 23:11:29 GMT Received: (from wsantee@localhost) by wsantee.oz.net (8.6.11/8.6.9) id QAA01813 for questions@freebsd.org; Mon, 21 Aug 1995 16:14:15 -0700 From: Wes Santee Message-Id: <199508212314.QAA01813@wsantee.oz.net> Subject: Account expiration bug or feature? To: questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 21 Aug 1995 16:14:14 -0700 (PDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME7a] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 787 Sender: questions-owner@freebsd.org Precedence: bulk I noticed that when automatic account expiration goes into effect, the users default shell isn't changed. That in and of itself is okay because they are still denied access when trying to telnet in. However, this still allows the user to ftp into the system because (I'm assuming) ftpd see's a valid shell and doesn't pay attention to the account expiration date. Is the fact that the user can still get ftp access to system after their account has expired considered a bug or a feature? Cheers, -- ( -Wes Santee | You're never dead 'til you're ) ( wsantee@wsantee.oz.net | out of quarters. --InSoc ) ( http://www.oz.net/~wsantee \------------------------------ ) ( O S / 2 W A R P Finger for PGP info F r e e B S D )