Date: Wed, 06 Apr 2016 07:33:50 +0200 From: Michelle Sullivan <michelle@sorbs.net> To: Kurt Jaeger <lists@opsec.eu>, =?UTF-8?Q?Martin_Waschb=c3=bcsch?= <martin@waschbuesch.de> Cc: ports@freebsd.org, Mathieu Arnold <mat@FreeBSD.org> Subject: Re: Committer needed for PR 208029 Message-ID: <57049FBE.9060400@sorbs.net> In-Reply-To: <20160406044431.GO35640@home.opsec.eu> References: <498CA3F8-15EF-45BD-880C-241F83CBE3DD@waschbuesch.de> <20160405185159.GK35640@home.opsec.eu> <20160405200835.GM35640@home.opsec.eu> <57042958.5010701@sorbs.net> <C96569DA-ADC5-4BE0-819A-7375C3F50D8E@waschbuesch.de> <20160406044431.GO35640@home.opsec.eu>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
Kurt Jaeger wrote: > Hi! > >> Actually, I just noticed (when compiling the port), that the Makefile now says: >> >> WITH_OPENSSL_PORT=yes > Yes, sorry, my fault. Fixed, and as suggested by mat: It is > now as IGNORE with a message explaining how to do it for 9.x. > Not sure about the IGNORE vs BROKEN but looks a *lot* better now. Would be interested as to an explanation of why the distinction between the two... especially as the port is 'broken' if you try and compile it against the wrong version of SSL... Mathieu? -- Michelle Sullivan http://www.mhix.org/
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?57049FBE.9060400>