From owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG  Mon Oct 17 13:17:44 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5844B106564A;
	Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:17:44 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (glebius.int.ru [81.19.64.117])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D539D8FC1E;
	Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:17:43 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from cell.glebius.int.ru (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9HDHg2b065431;
	Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:17:42 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
Received: (from glebius@localhost)
	by cell.glebius.int.ru (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9HDHgIV065430;
	Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:17:42 +0400 (MSD)
	(envelope-from glebius@FreeBSD.org)
X-Authentication-Warning: cell.glebius.int.ru: glebius set sender to
	glebius@FreeBSD.org using -f
Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 17:17:42 +0400
From: Gleb Smirnoff <glebius@FreeBSD.org>
To: Ermal Lu?i <eri@FreeBSD.org>
Message-ID: <20111017131742.GC51949@glebius.int.ru>
References: <201110151420.p9FEKulv026435@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<CAPBZQG0BU3ARwC7XwKjk1qy-1PYETGuLNDkYk3S=XFrXh4VYEQ@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=koi8-r
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <CAPBZQG0BU3ARwC7XwKjk1qy-1PYETGuLNDkYk3S=XFrXh4VYEQ@mail.gmail.com>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.21 (2010-09-15)
Cc: nerijus.ambrazas@ktu.lt, bug-followup@FreeBSD.org, freebsd-pf@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: kern/114095: [carp] carp+pf delay with high state limit
X-BeenThere: freebsd-pf@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: "Technical discussion and general questions about packet filter
	\(pf\)" <freebsd-pf.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
	<mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-pf>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-pf@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-pf>,
	<mailto:freebsd-pf-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 17 Oct 2011 13:17:44 -0000

On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 02:18:38PM +0200, Ermal Lu?i wrote:
E> On Sat, Oct 15, 2011 at 4:20 PM,  <glebius@freebsd.org> wrote:
E> > Synopsis: [carp] carp+pf delay with high state limit
E> >
E> > State-Changed-From-To: open->closed
E> > State-Changed-By: glebius
E> > State-Changed-When: Sat Oct 15 14:20:00 UTC 2011
E> > State-Changed-Why:
E> > Not a bug. This is a feature. pfsync(4) suppresses carp(4)
E> > preemption until new recently booted node downloads full
E> > table of pf(4) states from its peer.
E> 
E> This is not true on FreeBSD.
E> The issue might be from other reasons.

This is a surprise for me that this feature had been removed!

It used to be in stable/6:

http://fxr.watson.org/fxr/ident?v=FREEBSD60;i=carp_suppress_preempt

And I always treated that variable in CARP as shared with pf. Why did
they removed this feature from pfsync?

P.S. Since PR is about 6.2-RELEASE, then I have closed it correctly.

-- 
Totus tuus, Glebius.