From owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Thu Oct 27 09:00:29 2011
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 37A7B1065738
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:00:29 +0000 (UTC)
	(envelope-from gnats@FreeBSD.org)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (freefall.freebsd.org
	[IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::28])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 0CC678FC1A
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@hub.freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:00:29 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from freefall.freebsd.org (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4) with ESMTP id p9R90SNJ026431
	for <freebsd-ports-bugs@freefall.freebsd.org>;
	Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:00:28 GMT
	(envelope-from gnats@freefall.freebsd.org)
Received: (from gnats@localhost)
	by freefall.freebsd.org (8.14.4/8.14.4/Submit) id p9R90SPw026430;
	Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:00:28 GMT (envelope-from gnats)
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:00:28 GMT
Message-Id: <201110270900.p9R90SPw026430@freefall.freebsd.org>
To: freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
Cc: 
Subject: Re: ports/162049: The Ports tree lacks a framework to restart
	services
X-BeenThere: freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
Reply-To: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
List-Id: Ports bug reports <freebsd-ports-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-ports-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-ports-bugs>, 
	<mailto:freebsd-ports-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:00:29 -0000

The following reply was made to PR ports/162049; it has been noted by GNATS.

From: Chris Rees <crees@freebsd.org>
To: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
Cc: bug-followup@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports/162049: The Ports tree lacks a framework to restart services
Date: Thu, 27 Oct 2011 09:55:19 +0100

 This has been discussed several times, without a satisfactory answer
 unfortunately.
 
 You're right, not restarting the apache daemons is a security risk,
 but equally it's a risk to restart them automatically on upgrade in
 case it chokes on the config files etc.
 
 Perhaps a wider audience may be found on ports@?
 
 Chris