Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Sat, 4 Feb 2006 10:22:25 +0100
From:      Wilko Bulte <wb@freebie.xs4all.nl>
To:        Warner Losh <imp@bsdimp.com>
Cc:        src-committers@FreeBSD.ORG, harti@FreeBSD.ORG, sparc64@FreeBSD.ORG, stable@FreeBSD.ORG, kris@obsecurity.org
Subject:   Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
Message-ID:  <20060204092225.GB46310@freebie.xs4all.nl>
In-Reply-To: <20060203.215549.74746986.imp@bsdimp.com>
References:  <861wykr9vx.fsf@xps.des.no> <20060203.105305.71186162.imp@bsdimp.com> <43E4142A.4@samsco.org> <20060203.215549.74746986.imp@bsdimp.com>

next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On Fri, Feb 03, 2006 at 09:55:49PM -0700, Warner Losh wrote..
> From: Scott Long <scottl@samsco.org>
> Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
> Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 19:40:42 -0700
> 
> > Warner Losh wrote:
> > > From: des@des.no (Dag-Erling Smørgrav)
> > > Subject: Re: [releng_6 tinderbox] failure on sparc64/sparc64
> > > Date: Fri, 03 Feb 2006 11:53:38 +0100
> > > 
> > > 
> > >>Kris Kennaway <kris@obsecurity.org> writes:
> > >>
> > >>>COPTFLAGS=-O -pipe according to the tinderbox logs.
> > >>
> > >>Hmm, yes, apparently it only uses -O2 on HEAD.
> > > 
> > > 
> > > Can we not have special flags for tinderbox builds?  It make
> > > pre-commit testing a big pita.  How about just -O on both head and in
> > > RELENG_6?  The kernel make files have special magic to disable the
> > > parts of -O2 that are known to be bad because tinderbox uses -O2,
> > > despite efforts in the past to stop the practice.
> > > 
> > > Warner
> > > 
> > > 
> > 
> > There is value in testing -O2, since enabling that is a good long-term
> > goal.  What might be nice is to run tinderboxes with all default
> > compiler settings, and then once or twice a week to a special run that
> > has the more experimental flags.
> 
> My point is that it is unreasonable to get bitched at for tinerbox
> breakages that don't show up when building lint because the tinderbox
> person is too stubborn to not use non-standard flags.

I would think that the tinderboxes should run 100% the same flags as
what normal release builds use.  Nothing more, nothing less.

-- 
Wilko Bulte				wilko@FreeBSD.org



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?20060204092225.GB46310>