Skip site navigation (1)Skip section navigation (2)
Date:      Thu, 02 Apr 2015 23:13:45 +0000
From:      bugzilla-noreply@freebsd.org
To:        freebsd-ports-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject:   [Bug 199129] [PATCH] sysutils/synergy avoid -march=native producing broken packages for other CPUs
Message-ID:  <bug-199129-13@https.bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/>

next in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=199129

            Bug ID: 199129
           Summary: [PATCH] sysutils/synergy avoid -march=native producing
                    broken packages for other CPUs
           Product: Ports & Packages
           Version: Latest
          Hardware: Any
                OS: Any
            Status: New
          Keywords: patch
          Severity: Affects Some People
          Priority: ---
         Component: Individual Port(s)
          Assignee: kevlo@FreeBSD.org
          Reporter: mcdouga9@egr.msu.edu
          Keywords: patch
          Assignee: kevlo@FreeBSD.org
             Flags: maintainer-feedback?(kevlo@FreeBSD.org)

Created attachment 155137
  --> https://bugs.freebsd.org/bugzilla/attachment.cgi?id=155137&action=edit
Avoid -march= in ext/cryptopp

Recently I reinstalled my desktop and discovered synergy would coredump on
Illegal instruction:
kernel: pid 32211 (synergys), uid 21281: exited on signal 4 (core dumped)

I compile my own packages with poudriere and recently switched to a newer
server.  The synergy package I installed was from a newer Intel CPU that
supported optimizations that my older desktop does not.  These optimizations
were being applied to the bundled ext/cryptopp subdir in the synergy sources. 
Upstream I believe they are replacing it with openssl in the moderate future.

Server: CPU: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430 v2 @ 2.50GHz (2500.05-MHz K8-class
CPU)
Desktop: CPU: Intel(R) Core(TM) i5 CPU         660  @ 3.33GHz (3325.08-MHz
K8-class CPU)

I found in the compile logs that it was using -march=native for the bundled
cryptopp which I understand is undesirable for ports to use without being
specifically asked for (and I am not asking for it).  I made a patch that I am
using with success in poudriere.  I am submitting a patch for the port that
should be suitable for committing and it has been compile tested.  I remembered
to bump PORTREVISION this time.

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are the assignee for the bug.



Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?bug-199129-13>