From owner-freebsd-chat Sun Apr 12 23:14:14 1998 Return-Path: Received: (from majordom@localhost) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) id XAA13509 for freebsd-chat-outgoing; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 23:14:14 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (rah.star-gate.com [209.133.7.234]) by hub.freebsd.org (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA13501 for ; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 23:14:06 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Received: from rah.star-gate.com (localhost.star-gate.com [127.0.0.1]) by rah.star-gate.com (8.8.8/8.8.8) with ESMTP id XAA20262; Sun, 12 Apr 1998 23:13:58 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from hasty@rah.star-gate.com) Message-Id: <199804130613.XAA20262@rah.star-gate.com> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.0.2 2/24/98 To: Frank Pawlak cc: brett@lariat.org, chat@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: Re: New name? In-reply-to: Your message of "Mon, 13 Apr 1998 00:46:42 CDT." <199804130546.AAA02978@darkstar.connect.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Sun, 12 Apr 1998 23:13:57 -0700 From: Amancio Hasty Sender: owner-freebsd-chat@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Personally, I am not too keen on the vote thing rather I am more into a business thing. Station vs Server naming schemes sets the stage to create two separate product lines whose packaging can target different markets and initially as Brett pointed out we can charge a few extra hundred dollars for the Server version just as Microsoft has done by tweaking a few parameters 8) What I would consider the Station version needs a ton of work so in our case it may not be possible specially without business applications such as spreadsheets, word processors , etc... hwoever if we do managed to get a nice office suite and can price the OS / Apps at a reasonable price it can be the start of something really nice. Amancio To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-chat" in the body of the message