From owner-freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org Fri Dec 15 11:36:39 2017 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-multimedia@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 448E4EA395C for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:36:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from mail.turbocat.net (turbocat.net [IPv6:2a01:4f8:c17:6c4b::2]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 0BFD972703 for ; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:36:39 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from hps@selasky.org) Received: from hps2016.home.selasky.org (unknown [62.141.128.70]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES128-GCM-SHA256 (128/128 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.turbocat.net (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id 46092260152; Fri, 15 Dec 2017 12:36:36 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: FreeBSD amd64 GENERIC kernel To: blubee blubeeme Cc: "freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org" References: From: Hans Petter Selasky Message-ID: <4c3ae20e-b6dd-d5db-0b93-2e1225daa658@selasky.org> Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 12:33:48 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; FreeBSD amd64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.4.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit X-BeenThere: freebsd-multimedia@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.25 Precedence: list List-Id: Multimedia discussions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 15 Dec 2017 11:36:39 -0000 Hi, On 12/15/17 11:34, blubee blubeeme wrote: > I feel like you're talking at something and not understanding my objectives. > It's pretty simple: replace ALSA w/ upstreamed OSS. I think you need to dig a bit more into the code itself to see what are the actual differences before I can say if your idea is good or not. I'm sorry, but I don't know opensound's code well enough to comment further on this. > FreeBSD's implementation of OSS is missing a few features that hamstring > the development on FreeBSD. What are those features exactly? Why can't they be implemented in FreeBSD's sound stack? > Also, why would FreeBSD want to maintain it's own implementation of an open > source project? I believe this has been discussed before and maybe there are more threads around which will answer your question. https://forums.freebsd.org/threads/163/ > > What part of oss source: > https://sourceforge.net/p/opensound/git/ci/master/tree/ > is a binary blob? > OK, I see the source code is available and that "audio/oss" is compiled from source. --HPS