From owner-freebsd-doc@FreeBSD.ORG Sun Apr 6 16:03:10 2003 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id B1C1237B401; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 16:03:10 -0700 (PDT) Received: from sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01.attbi.com [204.127.202.61]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id BE18043F3F; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 16:03:09 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@employees.org) Received: from bmah.dyndns.org (12-240-204-110.client.attbi.com[12.240.204.110]) by sccrmhc01.attbi.com (sccrmhc01) with ESMTP id <20030406230308001002mpb6e>; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 23:03:08 +0000 Received: from intruder.bmah.org (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by bmah.dyndns.org (8.12.9/8.12.9) with ESMTP id h36N37s0033556; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 16:03:07 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from bmah@intruder.bmah.org) Received: (from bmah@localhost) by intruder.bmah.org (8.12.9/8.12.9/Submit) id h36N37ZO033555; Sun, 6 Apr 2003 16:03:07 -0700 (PDT) Date: Sun, 6 Apr 2003 16:03:07 -0700 From: "Bruce A. Mah" To: Ceri Davies , www@FreeBSD.org, doc@FreeBSD.org Message-ID: <20030406230307.GA33473@intruder.bmah.org> References: <20030405151719.GA75703@submonkey.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1; protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N" Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030405151719.GA75703@submonkey.net> User-Agent: Mutt/1.4.1i X-Image-Url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/Images/bmah-cisco-small.gif X-url: http://www.employees.org/~bmah/ Subject: Re: XHTML and the website X-BeenThere: freebsd-doc@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.1 Precedence: list List-Id: Documentation project List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Sun, 06 Apr 2003 23:03:11 -0000 --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline If memory serves me right, Ceri Davies wrote: > In August last year, a commit was made to change the website to XHTML, and > since then, all the documents built from SGML have been happily announcing > in their DOCTYPE declaration that they are XHTML 1.0 Transitional. > However, with the exception of the front page of the web site, they aren't; > none of them validate. I might note that all of the documents in our documentation set also claim to be XHTML. I wonder about them? If they're compliant, fixing *them* might be kind of hard since a lot of the XHTML is generated from the toolchain. Like Murray, the cost/benefit ratio is a little hazy to me, but I'd say as long as you're willing, and it doesn't break anything, go for it. Bruce. --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N Content-Type: application/pgp-signature Content-Disposition: inline -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.2.1 (FreeBSD) iD8DBQE+kLIr2MoxcVugUsMRAnsbAJ0UzHbmPCaAAOdUfE0qSt4hblnnCwCfTYAA AYt+8iRaqCWmps/zzm+acuo= =3pfT -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- --fUYQa+Pmc3FrFX/N--