From owner-freebsd-hackers  Sat Apr  8 10:25:15 1995
Return-Path: hackers-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id KAA19057
          for hackers-outgoing; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 10:25:15 -0700
Received: from trout.sri.MT.net (trout.sri.MT.net [204.182.243.12])
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with ESMTP id KAA19047
          for <hackers@FreeBSD.org>; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 10:25:11 -0700
Received: (from nate@localhost) by trout.sri.MT.net (8.6.11/8.6.10) id LAA23271; Sat, 8 Apr 1995 11:29:27 -0600
Date: Sat, 8 Apr 1995 11:29:27 -0600
Message-Id: <199504081729.LAA23271@trout.sri.MT.net>
To: Richard Toren <rpt@.sso.loral.com>
Cc: hackers@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: tar man page
In-Reply-To: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950408100407.995B-100000@miles>
References: <Pine.SUN.3.91.950408100407.995B-100000@miles>
Reply-To: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams)
From: nate@sneezy.sri.com (Nate Williams)
Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

Richard Toren writes:
> Just a thought. My CD of 2.0R did not contain a man page for tar.
> It appears to be GNU tar. Even the source tree for GNU tar had no man page.
> Maybe I lost it? 

Nope, it was added after 2.0R.  It is not part of the original
distribution and was contributed by a person outside of the GNU project.


Nate