From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Wed Nov 23 14:30:27 2005 Return-Path: X-Original-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.FreeBSD.org (mx1.freebsd.org [216.136.204.125]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id E0B1916A41F for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:30:27 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: from mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net (mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net [69.17.117.30]) by mx1.FreeBSD.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 975A743DAB for ; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:30:06 +0000 (GMT) (envelope-from freebsd-questions-local@be-well.ilk.org) Received: (qmail 20239 invoked from network); 23 Nov 2005 14:30:02 -0000 Received: from dsl092-078-145.bos1.dsl.speakeasy.net (HELO be-well.ilk.org) ([66.92.78.145]) (envelope-sender ) by mail28.sea5.speakeasy.net (qmail-ldap-1.03) with SMTP for ; 23 Nov 2005 14:30:02 -0000 Received: by be-well.ilk.org (Postfix, from userid 1147) id AADCB2841D; Wed, 23 Nov 2005 09:30:01 -0500 (EST) Sender: lowell@be-well.ilk.org To: "Pratt, Benjamin E." References: <0451409FD6EF4F49AE13E3D1DD45280027E2B0@EXCHANGE.campus.stcloudstate.edu> From: Lowell Gilbert Date: 23 Nov 2005 09:30:01 -0500 In-Reply-To: <0451409FD6EF4F49AE13E3D1DD45280027E2B0@EXCHANGE.campus.stcloudstate.edu> Message-ID: <444q6377yu.fsf@be-well.ilk.org> Lines: 17 User-Agent: Gnus/5.09 (Gnus v5.9.0) Emacs/21.3 MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Cc: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Subject: Re: libnet* questions X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Wed, 23 Nov 2005 14:30:28 -0000 "Pratt, Benjamin E." writes: > Hello, I'm writing to find out what others do, and what I can do, to > work with ports that require the now three different libnet* ports. What > I've been doing, and it seems like there should be an easier way, is > installing one libnet*, for instance net/libnet then running > portupgrade. I then deinstall net/libnet, install net/libnet-devel and > run portupgrade. Now there's net/libnet10 that I've got to deal with as > well. > > What is the best way people have found to get around package conflicts > with these ports? I haven't noticed any conflicts with these ports. libnet and libnet10 don't conflict at all -- they can be installed on the same machine -- and libnet-devel isn't required by anything else as far as I can see.