From owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Jul 11 21:12:25 2014 Return-Path: Delivered-To: questions@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [8.8.178.115]) (using TLSv1 with cipher ADH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 2904BA7C for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 21:12:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from mx01.qsc.de (mx01.qsc.de [213.148.129.14]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id DF668276B for ; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 21:12:24 +0000 (UTC) Received: from r56.edvax.de (port-92-195-69-249.dynamic.qsc.de [92.195.69.249]) (using TLSv1 with cipher DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mx01.qsc.de (Postfix) with ESMTPS id EEC443CDA7; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 23:12:22 +0200 (CEST) Received: from r56.edvax.de (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by r56.edvax.de (8.14.5/8.14.5) with SMTP id s6BLCMeT002703; Fri, 11 Jul 2014 23:12:22 +0200 (CEST) (envelope-from freebsd@edvax.de) Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 23:12:22 +0200 From: Polytropon To: Warren Block Subject: Re: gpart and bsdlabel Message-Id: <20140711231222.c09e89fe.freebsd@edvax.de> In-Reply-To: References: <20140711201114.GA2064@bewilderbeast.blackhelicopters.org> <20140711225249.cf2e3187.freebsd@edvax.de> Reply-To: Polytropon Organization: EDVAX X-Mailer: Sylpheed 3.1.1 (GTK+ 2.24.5; i386-portbld-freebsd8.2) Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Cc: questions@freebsd.org, "Michael W. Lucas" X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 11 Jul 2014 21:12:25 -0000 On Fri, 11 Jul 2014 15:04:00 -0600 (MDT), Warren Block wrote: > On Fri, 11 Jul 2014, Polytropon wrote: > > > Even though gpart can work with MBR partitioning, its > > primary goal is to be _the_ tool for GPT partitioning, > > which is "today's standard". > > More than that, gpart is meant to be a generic partitioning tool that > works with all types of standards. That's correct, but its main usage _today_ is GPT partitioning. It also has the advantage to usually work better with newer disks (where the fdisk and bsdlabel combo can get into trouble). Read my statement as "Nobody uses MBR anymore!" ;-) -- Polytropon Magdeburg, Germany Happy FreeBSD user since 4.0 Andra moi ennepe, Mousa, ...