From owner-freebsd-libh  Wed Apr 17  7:41:48 2002
Delivered-To: freebsd-libh@freebsd.org
Received: from southpole.winternet.com (southpole.winternet.com [198.174.169.153])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C3ECF37B405
	for <freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG>; Wed, 17 Apr 2002 07:41:45 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from tundra.winternet.com (nrahlstr@tundra.winternet.com [198.174.169.11])
	by southpole.winternet.com (8.12.2/8.12.1/sci) with ESMTP id g3HEfHZd012356;
	Wed, 17 Apr 2002 09:41:25 -0500 (CDT)
	SMTP "HELO" (ESMTP)  greeting from tundra.winternet.com
	But _really_ from :: nrahlstr@tundra.winternet.com [198.174.169.11]
	SMTP "MAIL From:" = nrahlstr@iceberg.winternet.com 
	SMTP "RCPT To:" = We have no RCPT
Received: (from nrahlstr@localhost)
	by tundra.winternet.com (8.10.2+Sun/8.10.2) id g3HEf9B27253;
	Wed, 17 Apr 2002 09:41:09 -0500 (CDT)
Date: Wed, 17 Apr 2002 09:41:09 -0500
From: Nathan Ahlstrom <nrahlstr@winternet.com>
To: Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net>
Cc: freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG
Subject: Re: libh project
Message-ID: <20020417144109.GB27157@winternet.com>
Mail-Followup-To: Nathan Ahlstrom <nrahlstr@winternet.com>,
	Miguel Mendez <flynn@energyhq.homeip.net>, freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG
References: <20020415211749.A97833@energyhq.homeip.net> <20020415194028.GA20546@winternet.com> <20020417162829.A22290@energyhq.homeip.net>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20020417162829.A22290@energyhq.homeip.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.3.24i
Sender: owner-freebsd-libh@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
List-ID: <freebsd-libh.FreeBSD.ORG>
List-Archive: <http://docs.freebsd.org/mail/> (Web Archive)
List-Help: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=help> (List Instructions)
List-Subscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=subscribe%20freebsd-libh>
List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:majordomo@FreeBSD.ORG?subject=unsubscribe%20freebsd-libh>
X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG


> I've been playing with libh for a while, and reading the source code. I
> think I might help documenting it. So my question is, is there a
> prefered format for that task? 

I think that Javadoc style comments are the required format, someone
correct me if I am wrong.  

The plan is to use doxygen (http://www.doxygen.org) to auto-generate 
HTML from the code documentation.

Thanks,
Nathan

-- 
Nathan Ahlstrom / nra@NetBSD.org / nra@FreeBSD.org / GPG: 0x67BC9D19

To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-libh" in the body of the message