From owner-cvs-all Mon Mar 8 11:17:26 1999 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from flood.ping.uio.no (flood.ping.uio.no [129.240.78.31]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 16570152FA; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 11:17:17 -0800 (PST) (envelope-from des@flood.ping.uio.no) Received: (from des@localhost) by flood.ping.uio.no (8.9.2/8.9.1) id UAA01647; Mon, 8 Mar 1999 20:16:59 +0100 (CET) (envelope-from des) To: Joerg Wunsch Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/usr.bin/window wwinit.c wwspawn.c References: <199903021908.LAA40787@freefall.freebsd.org> From: Dag-Erling Smorgrav Date: 08 Mar 1999 20:16:58 +0100 In-Reply-To: Joerg Wunsch's message of "Tue, 2 Mar 1999 11:08:10 -0800 (PST)" Message-ID: Lines: 12 X-Mailer: Gnus v5.5/Emacs 19.34 Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk Joerg Wunsch writes: > which case the parent simply told `subprocess died'. Unfortunately, > working around _this_ seems to be a lot more of redesign work compared > to little gained value, so i think relying on the specifics of vfork() > is the simpler way. In next week's episode, you'll try to convince me that wwenviron() and execvp() are vfork()-safe. DES -- Dag-Erling Smorgrav - des@flood.ping.uio.no To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message