From owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG  Fri May 28 10:38:31 2010
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id C57DE1065686;
	Fri, 28 May 2010 10:38:31 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from ed@hoeg.nl)
Received: from mx0.hoeg.nl (mx0.hoeg.nl [IPv6:2001:4dd0:ff41::b23f:aa])
	by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 8693F8FC0C;
	Fri, 28 May 2010 10:38:31 +0000 (UTC)
Received: by mx0.hoeg.nl (Postfix, from userid 1000)
	id E24A42A28CBE; Fri, 28 May 2010 12:38:30 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 12:38:30 +0200
From: Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
To: Guy Yur <guyyur@gmail.com>, brucec@FreeBSD.org, jilles@FreeBSD.org
Message-ID: <20100528103830.GK56080@hoeg.nl>
References: <201005281033.o4SAXjlv078228@freefall.freebsd.org>
	<20100528103618.GJ56080@hoeg.nl>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: multipart/signed; micalg=pgp-sha1;
	protocol="application/pgp-signature"; boundary="RAbP3WyQYKsI2/Hz"
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20100528103618.GJ56080@hoeg.nl>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14)
Cc: freebsd-bugs@FreeBSD.org
Subject: Re: bin/146916: [patch] sh(1) uses dumb terminal in single-user mode
X-BeenThere: freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5
Precedence: list
List-Id: Bug reports <freebsd-bugs.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-bugs>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-bugs@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-bugs>,
	<mailto:freebsd-bugs-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 28 May 2010 10:38:31 -0000


--RAbP3WyQYKsI2/Hz
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable

* Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl> wrote:
> Why should the shell be responsible for this? Shouldn't we put stuff
> like this in /sbin/init?

Oh wait. Never mind. I understand the issue. Jilles, what do you think
about this?

--=20
 Ed Schouten <ed@80386.nl>
 WWW: http://80386.nl/

--RAbP3WyQYKsI2/Hz
Content-Type: application/pgp-signature
Content-Disposition: inline

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.14 (FreeBSD)

iEYEARECAAYFAkv/nSYACgkQ52SDGA2eCwUcOQCfeCiB9qtW5D3EE7WjOQNVSgAy
ZbgAnAvIAhqPDyK9NLAij7kmVNoDDGfQ
=uIZa
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----

--RAbP3WyQYKsI2/Hz--