From owner-freebsd-ports  Sun Oct 22  3:58:38 2000
Delivered-To: freebsd-ports@freebsd.org
Received: from smtp6.mindspring.com (smtp6.mindspring.com [207.69.200.110])
	by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP
	id 4863737B4C5; Sun, 22 Oct 2000 03:58:34 -0700 (PDT)
Received: from silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (sji-ca3-04.ix.netcom.com [209.109.233.4])
	by smtp6.mindspring.com (8.9.3/8.8.5) with ESMTP id GAA15113;
	Sun, 22 Oct 2000 06:58:04 -0400 (EDT)
Received: (from asami@localhost)
	by silvia.hip.berkeley.edu (8.11.0/8.11.0) id e9MAsrK85739;
	Sun, 22 Oct 2000 03:54:53 -0700 (PDT)
	(envelope-from asami)
To: Dirk Froemberg <dirk@freebsd.org>
Cc: ports@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: ports in new layout and CVS
References: <20001022124852.A83272@physik.TU-Berlin.DE>
From: asami@freebsd.org (Satoshi - Ports Wraith - Asami)
Date: 22 Oct 2000 03:53:42 -0700
In-Reply-To: Dirk Froemberg's message of "Sun, 22 Oct 2000 12:48:53 +0200"
Message-ID: <vqclmvhjgeh.fsf@silvia.hip.berkeley.edu>
Lines: 16
X-Mailer: Gnus v5.7/Emacs 20.7
Sender: owner-freebsd-ports@FreeBSD.ORG
Precedence: bulk
X-Loop: FreeBSD.org

 * Dear Satoshi!

Hi Dirk!

 * Looking at bsd.port.mk line 599 and following I found that bsd.port.mk
 * checks if some directories are present. Of course they are present
 * if you check out a port from CVS...

Um, why is that? ;)

You should really use the -P flag to cvs update, or you are going to
end up with a whole lot of bogus directories (such as the entire
subtree for an already deleted port, not to mention thousand of
unneeded directories we are trying hard to get rid of).

Satoshi


To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org
with "unsubscribe freebsd-ports" in the body of the message