From owner-cvs-all Thu Sep 13 12:19: 7 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from InterJet.elischer.org (c421509-a.pinol1.sfba.home.com [24.7.86.9]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 10CF037B410; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 12:18:56 -0700 (PDT) Received: from localhost (localhost.elischer.org [127.0.0.1]) by InterJet.elischer.org (8.9.1a/8.9.1) with ESMTP id MAA64909; Thu, 13 Sep 2001 12:53:41 -0700 (PDT) Date: Thu, 13 Sep 2001 12:53:41 -0700 (PDT) From: Julian Elischer To: John Baldwin Cc: cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org Subject: Re: cvs commit: src/sys/fs/msdosfs denode.h msdosfs_denode.c msdosfs_lookup.c msdosfs_vfsops.c msdosfs_vnops.c In-Reply-To: <200109131901.f8DJ18442568@freefall.freebsd.org> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG Why are you doing this? having pointers to threads that are calle proc is going to be REALLY confusing! All vop operations will have threads (do) so why are you puting proc structures on them? On Thu, 13 Sep 2001, John Baldwin wrote: > jhb 2001/09/13 12:01:07 PDT > > Modified files: > sys/fs/msdosfs denode.h msdosfs_denode.c > msdosfs_lookup.c msdosfs_vfsops.c > msdosfs_vnops.c > Log: > Make this mostly portable again. > > Revision Changes Path > 1.23 +12 -2 src/sys/fs/msdosfs/denode.h > 1.59 +13 -13 src/sys/fs/msdosfs/msdosfs_denode.c > 1.37 +12 -12 src/sys/fs/msdosfs/msdosfs_lookup.c > 1.81 +48 -48 src/sys/fs/msdosfs/msdosfs_vfsops.c > 1.115 +61 -38 src/sys/fs/msdosfs/msdosfs_vnops.c > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message