From owner-freebsd-hackers Mon May 27 08:22:42 1996 Return-Path: owner-hackers Received: (from root@localhost) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) id IAA19602 for hackers-outgoing; Mon, 27 May 1996 08:22:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from Glock.COM (root@glock.com [198.82.228.165]) by freefall.freebsd.org (8.7.5/8.7.3) with ESMTP id IAA19597 for ; Mon, 27 May 1996 08:22:38 -0700 (PDT) Received: (from mmead@localhost) by Glock.COM (8.7.3/8.7.3) id LAA05548; Mon, 27 May 1996 11:22:31 -0400 (EDT) From: "matthew c. mead" Message-Id: <199605271522.LAA05548@Glock.COM> Subject: CHILD_MAX To: hackers@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 27 May 1996 11:22:31 -0400 (EDT) X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24 ME8a] MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=US-ASCII Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Sender: owner-hackers@freebsd.org X-Loop: FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk Does anyone know why CHILD_MAX for the kernel and CHILD_MAX in the /usr/include/sys/syslimits.h are different (128 and 40 respectively)? I'm running into the problem of having too few processes available. If I redefine the define in syslimits.h to 128 will I be able to run right away, or am I correct in presuming that I'm going to have to rebuild things? What all will I have to rebuild? -matt -- Matthew C. Mead mmead@Glock.COM http://www.goof.com/~mmead/