From owner-freebsd-questions Wed Nov 8 12:27:51 2000 Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Received: from po3.wam.umd.edu (po3.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.165]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 51DA137B4C5 for ; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 12:27:45 -0800 (PST) Received: from rac3.wam.umd.edu (IDENT:root@rac3.wam.umd.edu [128.8.10.143]) by po3.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA26094; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 15:27:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from rac3.wam.umd.edu (IDENT:sendmail@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by rac3.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with SMTP id PAA01660; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 15:27:24 -0500 (EST) Received: from localhost (culverk@localhost) by rac3.wam.umd.edu (8.9.3/8.9.3) with ESMTP id PAA01649; Wed, 8 Nov 2000 15:27:24 -0500 (EST) X-Authentication-Warning: rac3.wam.umd.edu: culverk owned process doing -bs Date: Wed, 8 Nov 2000 15:27:23 -0500 (EST) From: Kenneth Wayne Culver To: "Zaitsau, Andrei" Cc: "'Lee J Carmichael'" , mac , freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Subject: RE: KNE100TX - Ethernetcard In-Reply-To: <054F7DAA9E54D311AD090008C74CE9BD01766D77@exchange.panasonicfa.com> Message-ID: MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII Sender: owner-freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG pn0? wierd... mine runs as de0... hrmm.. I havn't run 3.x in years though. ================================================================= | Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best NT upgrade | | Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 | | and student at The | AIM: muythaibxr | | The University of Maryland, | Website: (Under Construction) | | College Park. | http://www.wam.umd.edu/~culverk/| ================================================================= On Wed, 8 Nov 2000, Zaitsau, Andrei wrote: > I dunno guys, I run FreeBSD 3.4 as Gateway with 2 NIC's installed. One of > them is KNE100TX which is connected to ADSL modem, the device name is pn0 , > and I never had any problems with it... > Andrei... > > -----Original Message----- > From: Lee J Carmichael [mailto:lcarmich@wamnet.com] > Sent: Wednesday, November 08, 2000 9:30 AM > To: Kenneth Wayne Culver > Cc: mac; freebsd-questions@FreeBSD.ORG > Subject: Re: KNE100TX - Ethernetcard > > > Hello Kenneth, > > I agree, that changing the attach section wouldn't be too difficult. I'm > sorry if I had the jargon incorrect as well. > > Take Care, > -------- > Lee Carmichael WAM!NET Inc. > System Engineer 655 Lone Oak Rd Building E > 651-256-5292 Eagan, MN 55121 > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > > > In that case it would not have said "de0" I did look at the code, it would > > say "pci0" instead of "de0" so it at least got through the probe portion > > of the code, it probably failed in attach, I guess I just used the wrong > > word... chances are that if someone goes through the code it is probably > > not too hard to make this chip work. > > > > > > ================================================================= > > | Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best NT upgrade | > > | Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 | > > | and student at The | AIM: muythaibxr | > > | The University of Maryland, | Website: (Under Construction) | > > | College Park. | http://www.wam.umd.edu/~culverk/| > > ================================================================= > > > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Lee J Carmichael wrote: > > > > > No it isn't. Just because it attempted to guess doesn't mean it was able > > > to load a driver or attach a device. If it doesn't show up as a network > > > device it didn't find a driver. Read the device driver code, I bet you > > > wouldn't find support for that revision of the chip in it. Just like the > > > AMD chipset I checked over. Basically, it finds a superset for that > > > chipset but not that particular version so it guesses at detection but > > > isn't able to anything more. > > > > > > Mac: I ran into this on 4.1. > > > > > > -------- > > > Lee Carmichael WAM!NET Inc. > > > System Engineer 655 Lone Oak Rd Building E > > > 651-256-5292 Eagan, MN 55121 > > > > > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Kenneth Wayne Culver wrote: > > > > > > > this is wrong... it says "de0:" so that means it IS attaching a device > > > > driver. > > > > > > > > > > > > ================================================================= > > > > | Kenneth Culver | FreeBSD: The best NT upgrade | > > > > | Unix Systems Administrator | ICQ #: 24767726 | > > > > | and student at The | AIM: muythaibxr | > > > > | The University of Maryland, | Website: (Under Construction) | > > > > | College Park. | http://www.wam.umd.edu/~culverk/| > > > > ================================================================= > > > > > > > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, Lee J Carmichael wrote: > > > > > > > > > Hello Mac, > > > > > > > > > > In my experience, this means that the ethernet card/chipset is > detected > > > > > but that it does not have a driver for it. Basically, you need to > search > > > > > for a driver(or write one) to use the card/chipset. > > > > > > > > > > -------- > > > > > Lee Carmichael WAM!NET Inc. > > > > > System Engineer 655 Lone Oak Rd Building E > > > > > 651-256-5292 Eagan, MN 55121 > > > > > > > > > > On Tue, 7 Nov 2000, mac wrote: > > > > > > > > > > > hi there, > > > > > > > > > > > > i got a really strange problem with this KNE100TX from Kingston: > > > > > > de0: at device 11.0 on pci0 > > > > > > de0: driver is using old-style compatibility shims > > > > > > > > > > > > that's the bootmessage (the dc-driver did not produce any > information at > > > > > > boottime), but i can't attach ip-numbers on it. if a make a > ifconfig -a > > > > > > the device is not listed. > > > > > > > > > > > > die digital-chip on the card says: 21140-AF > > > > > > > > > > > > could someone help me? > > > > > > > > > > > > thanks in advance > > > > > > mac > > > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > > DaMac@irc: #team23.org > > > > > > mac@deam.org > > > > > > PGP-ID#: 0x6F28F58E > > > > > > PGP-Type: DH/DSS | 2048/1024 > > > > > > -------------------------------------> http://mac.deam.org > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > > > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > > > > > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > > > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org > with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message > To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe freebsd-questions" in the body of the message