From owner-freebsd-current  Tue Jul 25 23:55:53 1995
Return-Path: current-owner
Received: (from majordom@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id XAA08383
          for current-outgoing; Tue, 25 Jul 1995 23:55:53 -0700
Received: (from phk@localhost)
          by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id XAA08372
          ; Tue, 25 Jul 1995 23:55:52 -0700
From: Poul-Henning Kamp <phk>
Message-Id: <199507260655.XAA08372@freefall.cdrom.com>
Subject: Re: recent changes to cpio still breaking my world..
To: jkh@time.cdrom.com (Jordan K. Hubbard)
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 1995 23:55:52 -0700 (PDT)
Cc: bde@freefall.cdrom.com, current@freefall.cdrom.com
In-Reply-To: <12010.806727462@time.cdrom.com> from "Jordan K. Hubbard" at Jul 25, 95 07:57:42 pm
X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL24]
Content-Type: text
Content-Length: 823       
Sender: current-owner@FreeBSD.org
Precedence: bulk

> Now it turns out that cpio doesn't accept the `-H newc' flag in
> combination with the `-dump' options used to create floppies in the
> release procedure..  In fact, it doesn't seem to accept ANY value for
> -H..
> 
> This is really hanging me up, so unless a quick fix suggests itself in
> the next 12 hours I am going to back out your original changes to cpio
> that are causing me all this grief.
> 
> This is just a `heads up'..  Thanks!

Well, I said so, with "-dump" there shouldn't be any problems with
minors, and -H <foo> should not be needed.

-- 
Poul-Henning Kamp           | phk@FreeBSD.ORG       FreeBSD Core-team.
http://www.freebsd.org/~phk | phk@login.dknet.dk    Private mailbox.
whois: [PHK]                | phk@ref.tfs.com       TRW Financial Systems, Inc.
Just that: dried leaves in boiling water ?