From owner-freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Mon Mar 11 15:41:46 2019 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-questions@mailman.ysv.freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2610:1c1:1:606c::19:1]) by mailman.ysv.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id CAC161517E78 for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:41:46 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from samir.otmane@numericable.fr) Received: from smtp6.tech.numericable.fr (smtp6.tech.numericable.fr [82.216.111.42]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (Client did not present a certificate) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id B30186C98F for ; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:41:45 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from samir.otmane@numericable.fr) Received: from mowmail-nc1.nc.sdv.fr (mowmail-nc1.tech.numericable.fr [82.216.111.101]) by smtp6.tech.numericable.fr (Postfix) with SMTP id A6E27182F59; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:41:37 +0100 (CET) Received: from [87.231.4.183] by webmail.numericable.fr with http webmail; Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:41:37 +0100 (CET) X-EA-Auth: YfyBWYeUMgff/htvUQm6P8hva4s52Ll+BO58OVOya6rWXujjen2P3PBiGEi mgtwHmrhs12v4l0+FsMGdDIlkez+2yu2iPlbi From: samir.otmane@numericable.fr To: "Carmel NY" , freebsd-questions@freebsd.org Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 16:41:37 +0100 (CET) Subject: Re: Re: Barebone kernel options request X-Priority: 3 MIME-Version: 1.0 X-Mailer: COMS/EA14.11/r20171018 Message-ID: In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset="ISO-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-VR-SPAMSTATE: OK X-VR-SPAMSCORE: -100 X-VR-SPAMCAUSE: gggruggvucftvghtrhhoucdtuddrgedutddrgeeigdejkecutefuodetggdotefrodftvfcurfhrohhfihhlvgemucfpfgfogfftkfevteeunffgpdfqfgfvnecuuegrihhlohhuthemuceftddtnecusecvtfgvtghiphhivghnthhsucdlqddutddtmdenucfjughrpefhvfffuffrggfokfgjtgfgsehtqhdttdertddunecuhfhrohhmpehsrghmihhrrdhothhmrghnvgesnhhumhgvrhhitggrsghlvgdrfhhrnecuffhomhgrihhnpeifihhkihhpvgguihgrrdhorhhgnecukfhppeekjedrvdefuddrgedrudekfeenucfrrghrrghmpehmohguvgepshhmthhpohhuthenucevlhhushhtvghrufhiiigvpedt X-Rspamd-Queue-Id: B30186C98F X-Spamd-Bar: / Authentication-Results: mx1.freebsd.org X-Spamd-Result: default: False [0.74 / 15.00]; ARC_NA(0.00)[]; RECEIVED_SPAMHAUS_PBL(0.00)[183.4.231.87.zen.spamhaus.org : 127.0.0.10]; IP_SCORE(-0.26)[ipnet: 82.216.0.0/17(-0.72), asn: 21502(-0.57), country: FR(-0.01)]; TO_DN_SOME(0.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_SHORT(0.42)[0.416,0]; NEURAL_HAM_LONG(-0.95)[-0.952,0]; MIME_GOOD(-0.10)[text/plain]; DMARC_NA(0.00)[numericable.fr]; AUTH_NA(1.00)[]; NEURAL_SPAM_MEDIUM(0.74)[0.742,0]; RCVD_COUNT_THREE(0.00)[3]; TO_MATCH_ENVRCPT_SOME(0.00)[]; MX_GOOD(-0.01)[cached: mta.numericable.fr]; RCPT_COUNT_TWO(0.00)[2]; FROM_NO_DN(0.00)[]; HAS_X_PRIO_THREE(0.00)[3]; R_SPF_NA(0.00)[]; FREEMAIL_TO(0.00)[outlook.com]; RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW(-0.10)[42.111.216.82.list.dnswl.org : 127.0.5.1]; R_DKIM_NA(0.00)[]; MIME_TRACE(0.00)[0:+]; ASN(0.00)[asn:21502, ipnet:82.216.0.0/17, country:FR]; RCVD_TLS_LAST(0.00)[]; FROM_EQ_ENVFROM(0.00)[] X-BeenThere: freebsd-questions@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.29 Precedence: list List-Id: User questions List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 11 Mar 2019 15:41:47 -0000 >Not really related about hardware, i just don't like being enforced >features that i don't need/want of, yet i understand that there will >*might* not be noticeable performance impact upon keeping/get rid of >some features. > > >---- Message d'origine ---- >De : "Carmel NY" >=C0 : "FreeBSD" >Objet : Re: Barebone kernel options request >Date : 11/03/2019 14:54:48 CET > >On Mon, 11 Mar 2019 09:08:48 -0400, Robert Huff stated: > >>Polytropon writes: >>=20 >>> You will then make a copy of the GENERIC kernel configuration file >>> and adjust it to your needs, i. e., remove all the entries you do >>> not need.=20 >> >> Proceed with caution here. >> I do not know if it is currently true, but it has in the past >>been the case that (e.g.) option Q depends on device F which depends >>on device B; while the relationship between Q and F is documented in >>the config file, the one between F and B is not. >> The easy targets are disk(/RAID) drivers and network cards. >>After that? Stay alert; trust no-one; keep your un-delete key handy. >> >> >> Respectfully, >> >> >> Robert Huff=20 > >Just out of some sort of morbid curiosity, I would be interested in >knowing exactly what problem the OP is trying to correct or alleviate >here. If his storage, memory or whatever resources are stretched to the >limit, he would be better served by purchasing a newer, more powerful >machine. "You can't make a silk purse out of a sow's ear." > samir.otmane@numericable, could we retire the "Top Posting" technique? --=20 Carmel Sure, i'm sorry for the inconvenience (As i'm not used to mailing list pos= ting-style)