From owner-freebsd-current@FreeBSD.ORG Fri Dec 12 15:42:32 2008 Return-Path: Delivered-To: current@FreeBSD.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 526E61065672; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:42:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from cyrus.watson.org (cyrus.watson.org [65.122.17.42]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 2CA988FC1D; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:42:32 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from rwatson@FreeBSD.org) Received: from fledge.watson.org (fledge.watson.org [65.122.17.41]) by cyrus.watson.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id DDA5C46B0D; Fri, 12 Dec 2008 10:42:31 -0500 (EST) Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:42:31 +0000 (GMT) From: Robert Watson X-X-Sender: robert@fledge.watson.org To: Roman Divacky In-Reply-To: <20081212112030.GA74265@freebsd.org> Message-ID: References: <4940A685.7040608@psg.com> <494216C2.7080606@kkip.pl> <20081212095238.GY2038@deviant.kiev.zoral.com.ua> <20081212112030.GA74265@freebsd.org> User-Agent: Alpine 1.10 (BSF 962 2008-03-14) MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: TEXT/PLAIN; charset=US-ASCII; format=flowed Cc: Kostik Belousov , Randy Bush , Bartosz Stec , FreeBSD Current Subject: Re: panic: sleeping thread & bufwrite: buffer is not busy??? X-BeenThere: freebsd-current@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Discussions about the use of FreeBSD-current List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Fri, 12 Dec 2008 15:42:32 -0000 On Fri, 12 Dec 2008, Roman Divacky wrote: >>> You are mixing the issues without a reason. To claim that you problem is >>> similar, you need to show the similar backtrace. The panic shown is the >>> late manifestation of a problem, it is kind a catch-all for some sort of >>> locking issues. >> >> This is the second report of weird rwlock-related panics in a week. We >> should read the code on this one closely, but I can't help but notice that >> it's similar to Roman's report of an rwlock-related panic. Was there a >> locking/scheduling change in the last week or two in -current that could >> explain these symptoms? > > I still have the vmcore from the crash... can it help? I think the most important thing is to see the contents of *inp and *inp->inp_lock.lock_object. Robert N M Watson Computer Laboratory University of Cambridge