Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2019 13:47:13 +0100 From: Hans Ottevanger <hans@beastielabs.net> To: =?UTF-8?Q?Trond_Endrest=c3=b8l?= <Trond.Endrestol@fagskolen.gjovik.no>, FreeBSD stable <freebsd-stable@freebsd.org> Cc: mckusick@freebsd.org Subject: Re: 12-stable buildworld appears to be broken Message-ID: <e5c88212-480e-7071-a9f9-cedebefa3a03@beastielabs.net> In-Reply-To: <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1903070827340.11588@mail.fig.ol.no> References: <20190307051342.GB34798@rpi3.zyxst.net> <alpine.BSF.2.21.9999.1903070827340.11588@mail.fig.ol.no>
next in thread | previous in thread | raw e-mail | index | archive | help
On 3/7/19 8:29 AM, Trond Endrestøl wrote: > On Thu, 7 Mar 2019 05:13-0000, tech-lists wrote: > >> Hi, >> >> My context is poudriere creating jails on freebsd12-stable. This procedure >> worked fine for some other jails I created a couple days ago (the 5th) but >> now, today I get buildworld failures with creating either amd64 or armv7 jails >> (the server is amd64) >> >> To try to see the failure, I set jobs to J1 like so: >> >> poudriere jail -x -J1 -c -j 12armv7 -a arm.armv7 -m svn+https -v >> stable/12 >> >> It bails when it's making rescue with this error: >> >> /data/poudriere/basefs/jails/12armv7/usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/pass1.c:454:13: >> error: too many arguments to function call, expected 0, have 1 >> inodirty(dp); >> ~~~~~~~~ ^~ >> /data/poudriere/basefs/jails/12armv7/usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/fsck.h:453:1: >> note: 'inodirty' declared here >> void inodirty(void); ^ >> 1 error generated. >> *** [pass1.o] Error code 1 >> >> I know that's probably not enough, so have pasted much more output at >> https://rpi3.zyxst.net/errors/poudriere-build-failure.txt >> >> not tried make buildworld yet on the host. The OS is at r344763 and >> /usr/src is at 344863 >> >> Just tried it on another 12-stable desktop, straightforward make >> buildworld, same sort of error: >> >> --- all_subdir_sbin/fsdb --- >> /usr/src/sbin/fsdb/fsdb.c:1042:14: error: too many arguments to function >> call, expected 0, have 1 >> inodirty(curinode); >> ~~~~~~~~ ^~~~~~~~ /usr/src/sbin/fsck_ffs/fsck.h:453:1: note: >> 'inodirty' declared >> here >> void inodirty(void); >> >> the sources are at 344869 > > It's good to see I'm not the only one experiencing this issue. It > looks like r339941 was never merged to stable/12. > FWIW, the same happens in stable/11 (r344876). Kind regards, Hans Ottevanger
Want to link to this message? Use this URL: <https://mail-archive.FreeBSD.org/cgi/mid.cgi?e5c88212-480e-7071-a9f9-cedebefa3a03>