From owner-freebsd-stable@FreeBSD.ORG Mon Apr 19 18:54:48 2010 Return-Path: Delivered-To: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org [IPv6:2001:4f8:fff6::34]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id A9FEC1065686 for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:54:48 +0000 (UTC) (envelope-from jdc@koitsu.dyndns.org) Received: from qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net (qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net [76.96.30.16]) by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 7D3768FC2B for ; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:54:48 +0000 (UTC) Received: from omta19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net ([76.96.30.76]) by qmta01.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 7V9i1e00C1eYJf8A1Wuoeg; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:54:48 +0000 Received: from koitsu.dyndns.org ([98.248.46.159]) by omta19.emeryville.ca.mail.comcast.net with comcast id 7Wuo1e0013S48mS01Wuoaf; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:54:48 +0000 Received: by icarus.home.lan (Postfix, from userid 1000) id B8BFA9B419; Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:54:46 -0700 (PDT) Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 11:54:46 -0700 From: Jeremy Chadwick To: Doug Barton Message-ID: <20100419185446.GA36397@icarus.home.lan> References: <20100418213727.GA98129@icarus.home.lan> <20100418232420.GA4620@duncan.reilly.home> <4BCC9B5D.5020603@FreeBSD.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4BCC9B5D.5020603@FreeBSD.org> User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.20 (2009-06-14) Cc: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org Subject: Re: rc(8) script -- waiting for the network to become usable X-BeenThere: freebsd-stable@freebsd.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.5 Precedence: list List-Id: Production branch of FreeBSD source code List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , X-List-Received-Date: Mon, 19 Apr 2010 18:54:48 -0000 On Mon, Apr 19, 2010 at 11:05:17AM -0700, Doug Barton wrote: > On 4/18/2010 4:24 PM, Andrew Reilly wrote: > > By way of discussion, I'd just like to re-iterate what I > > said the first time around: it must be understood that this > > sort of thing is a (necessary) hacky-workaround that should > > ultimately be unnecessary. > > While I find the discussion about launchd-type facilities interesting, > we have a real problem at the moment and now we have a real solution for it. > > Jeremy, since no one has criticized your idea on a technical basis why > don't you run it by the -net and -rc lists to be sure that it's > technically sound, then I would be inclined to move forward with it. Doug and Garrett -- thanks. I'll send a shorter mail to said lists referencing the discussion here on -stable and let folks weigh in. Much appreciated! -- | Jeremy Chadwick jdc@parodius.com | | Parodius Networking http://www.parodius.com/ | | UNIX Systems Administrator Mountain View, CA, USA | | Making life hard for others since 1977. PGP: 4BD6C0CB |