From owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG  Tue Oct 21 18:39:24 2014
Return-Path: <owner-freebsd-net@FreeBSD.ORG>
Delivered-To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Received: from mx1.freebsd.org (mx1.freebsd.org
 [IPv6:2001:1900:2254:206a::19:1])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher AECDH-AES256-SHA (256/256 bits))
 (No client certificate requested)
 by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id D1795EE1
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:39:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from mail.1970jan1-epo.ch (mail.1970jan1-epo.ch
 [IPv6:2a02:2770:13::1a24:0:11])
 (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits))
 (Client did not present a certificate)
 by mx1.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 9098465E
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:39:24 +0000 (UTC)
Received: from 1970jan1-epo.ch (c-174-57-248-44.hsd1.pa.comcast.net
 [174.57.248.44])
 by mail.1970jan1-epo.ch (Postfix) with ESMTPSA id B89D054C
 for <freebsd-net@freebsd.org>; Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:39:20 +0000 (UTC)
DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/simple; d=1970jan1-epo.ch;
 s=1970; t=1413916761;
 bh=4ISzKqMbJqTi3TgfNx+Pq9BWhQIHLJbBVlJxI6VtZ3g=;
 h=Date:From:To:Subject:References:In-Reply-To;
 b=TfFP8zwNz0z5HIvjt4W6buADbe6dpdn5ampMA3otvBLVnhUPIm6pVrgwcPsHG7PNu
 ZxKbKc4zQ8dwlPkG8EgbbbAvHWmlb2sBk9J8GNJmNhE66DFN+EbyqdKnFrTE4RZtQO
 EkRXywYX/WiphbWlaUWB/JiEcUcuJ/nagrmBL2+U=
Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 14:39:19 -0400
From: Kyle Williams <Kyle@1970Jan1-Epo.ch>
To: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
Subject: Re: Broken IPsec + enc +pf/ipfw
Message-ID: <20141021183919.GD2787@1970jan1-epo.ch>
References: <544535C2.9020301@shrew.net> <544566D2.40303@FreeBSD.org>
 <544569CF.2060905@shrew.net> <54457599.4060102@yandex.ru>
 <54458001.6000507@shrew.net> <544611F8.9070403@yandex.ru>
 <20141021160643.GB2787@1970jan1-epo.ch> <54468B43.40602@shrew.net>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <54468B43.40602@shrew.net>
User-Agent: Mutt/1.5.23 (2014-03-12)
X-BeenThere: freebsd-net@freebsd.org
X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.18-1
Precedence: list
List-Id: Networking and TCP/IP with FreeBSD <freebsd-net.freebsd.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/options/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/freebsd-net/>
List-Post: <mailto:freebsd-net@freebsd.org>
List-Help: <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.freebsd.org/mailman/listinfo/freebsd-net>,
 <mailto:freebsd-net-request@freebsd.org?subject=subscribe>
X-List-Received-Date: Tue, 21 Oct 2014 18:39:24 -0000

On Tue Oct 21 11:35:15 2014, Matthew Grooms wrote:
>Hey Kyle,
>
>Thanks for lending a hand. I tested a few myself last night but had no 
>luck. This morning I received an email off list that pointed to a patch 
>that was merged to 10 stable. It sounds promising ...
>
>Log:
>   Merge r263091: fix mbuf flags clash that lead to failure of operation
>   of IPSEC and packet filters.
>
>https://lists.freebsd.org/pipermail/svn-src-stable-10/2014-March/001111.html
>
>I won't have a chance to try it until after business hours tonight, but 
>will report back to the list with my results. Alternately, I assume you 
>also could upgrade to 10.1-RC2 as the MFC for this patch happened back 
>in March. I may go this route myself and then bump up to RELEASE in a 
>few weeks when it happens.

r263091, r266800, and r272695 together on 10.0-RELENG works for me.

I didn't test r263091 by itself.

Thanks!

-- 
Kyle Williams
(541) 250 0314
Kyle@1970Jan1-epo.ch
PGP key: 0xD1E5BADF