From owner-freebsd-hackers Sun Apr 23 18:13:03 1995 Return-Path: hackers-owner Received: (from majordom@localhost) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) id SAA15648 for hackers-outgoing; Sun, 23 Apr 1995 18:13:03 -0700 Received: from UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU (root@UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU [129.7.1.11]) by freefall.cdrom.com (8.6.10/8.6.6) with SMTP id SAA15641 for ; Sun, 23 Apr 1995 18:12:58 -0700 Received: from Taronga.COM by UUCP-GW.CC.UH.EDU with UUCP id AA15657 (5.67a/IDA-1.5); Sun, 23 Apr 1995 20:03:27 -0500 Received: by bonkers.taronga.com (smail2.5p) id AA16136; 23 Apr 95 19:51:08 CDT (Sun) Received: (from peter@localhost) by bonkers.taronga.com (8.6.11/8.6.6) id TAA16133; Sun, 23 Apr 1995 19:51:07 -0500 From: Peter da Silva Message-Id: <199504240051.TAA16133@bonkers.taronga.com> Subject: Re: Re(2): IP problem with 950412-SNAP (and earlier -SNAPs) To: Andrew.Gordon@net-tel.co.uk Date: Sun, 23 Apr 1995 19:51:07 -0500 (CDT) Cc: amurai@spec.co.jp, hackers@FreeBSD.org In-Reply-To: <"PC-950423232723-3424*/G=Andrew/S=Gordon/O=NET-TEL Computer from "Andrew.Gordon@net-tel.co.uk" at Apr 23, 95 11:28:28 pm X-Mailer: ELM [version 2.4 PL23] Content-Type: text Content-Length: 249 Sender: hackers-owner@FreeBSD.org Precedence: bulk > or else the kernel restriction on routing to the local > interface address needs to be relaxed (but what if you have multiple > point-to-point links sharing the same address). How could you do that? Each interface needs to have a unique address.