From owner-cvs-all Fri Jul 13 14:10: 8 2001 Delivered-To: cvs-all@freebsd.org Received: from Awfulhak.org (gw.Awfulhak.org [217.204.245.18]) by hub.freebsd.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id D633F37B446; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 14:09:53 -0700 (PDT) (envelope-from brian@Awfulhak.org) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (root@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org [172.16.0.12]) by Awfulhak.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f6DL9PY02775; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:09:25 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@lan.Awfulhak.org) Received: from hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (brian@localhost [127.0.0.1]) by hak.lan.Awfulhak.org (8.11.4/8.11.4) with ESMTP id f6DLAKW65769; Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:10:20 +0100 (BST) (envelope-from brian@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org) Message-Id: <200107132110.f6DLAKW65769@hak.lan.Awfulhak.org> X-Mailer: exmh version 2.3.1 01/18/2001 with nmh-1.0.4 To: Mike Barcroft Cc: Jordan Hubbard , tobex@tobez.org, sobomax@FreeBSD.org, dd@FreeBSD.org, cvs-committers@FreeBSD.org, cvs-all@FreeBSD.org, brian@Awfulhak.org Subject: Re: Another immediate MFC that isn't really necessary [was: cvs commit: src/libexec/talkd announce.c] In-Reply-To: Message from Mike Barcroft of "Fri, 13 Jul 2001 17:17:13 EDT." <200107132117.f6DLHDv25225@coffee.q9media.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Date: Fri, 13 Jul 2001 22:10:20 +0100 From: Brian Somers Sender: owner-cvs-all@FreeBSD.ORG Precedence: bulk List-ID: List-Archive: (Web Archive) List-Help: (List Instructions) List-Subscribe: List-Unsubscribe: X-Loop: FreeBSD.ORG > Jordan Hubbard writes: > > I don't think so, and it really should be in the committer's guide. > > That's a strong hint to the folks who implemented it. :) > > No, it's in there. Section 8, Rule 7: > Changes go to -CURRENT before -STABLE unless specifically permitted by > the release engineer or unless they're not applicable to -CURRENT. > Any non-trivial or non-urgent change which is applicable should also > be allowed to sit in -CURRENT for at least 3 days before merging so > that it can be given sufficient testing. The release engineer has the > same authority over the -STABLE branch as outlined for the maintainer > in rule #5. The change that started this discussion could not be described as anything but trivial. > Best regards, > Mike Barcroft -- Brian http://www.freebsd-services.com/ Don't _EVER_ lose your sense of humour ! To Unsubscribe: send mail to majordomo@FreeBSD.org with "unsubscribe cvs-all" in the body of the message